Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]
FEATURES . . . . . . ABOUT . . . . . . CONTACT . . . . . . SHOP . . . . . . RADIO WoS . . . . . . NEWS . . . . . . SUBSCRIBE . . . . . . WoS FRONT PAGE
Welcome to WoS Forums. We hope you enjoy your visit.


You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board, it looks a bit ugly, and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free.


Join our community!


If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features:

Username:   Password:
Add Reply
Jock News; tracking the road to independence
Topic Started: May 9 2008, 08:28 AM (14,179 Views)
RevStu
Member Avatar
Laird/Beast Of Glencairn

I'm putting this thread (which I'll shortly pin) here largely for my own benefit, to keep some pertinent facts to hand for the ongoing debate over the next couple of years. However, since my English pals are now facing the very real prospect of having a Tory government for the rest of their lives (only ONE Labour Prime Minister in the last 100 years would have had a majority in Westminster if Scotland was independent), you might also be passingly interested. (And it'll keep it from cluttering up the ordinary "news" thread.)

Today, I've uncovered a report from the not-notoriously-socialist-or-separatist Adam Smith Institute on Scotland's economic prospects as a separate nation, a subject which attracts much hot dispute over who subsidises who in the UK.

http://www.adamsmith.org/briefings/briefin...es-20071120102/

Quote:
 
If an independent Scotland chose to follow the Republic of Ireland's low-tax route, as SNP leader Alex Salmond has indicated it would, Scotland's growth rate might be expected, over a five-year period, to move closer to Ireland's trend growth rate of 7 percent. Given a further five years of Scottish growth at that trend level, and before diminishing returns set in, Scotland's growth over the ten-year period would put its index 71.5 higher, more than a two-thirds increase in GDP.

By contrast, says Stein, the rest of the UK would be expected to have grown rather less, by just over a quarter. The result would be dramatic for Scotland. Measured in household income per head, Scotland, which started £1,700 behind the rest of the UK, could be expected to be £6,000 ahead of it at the end of that period.

We believe that the new research study shows just what can be achieved if countries choose to follow the low tax route to prosperity, a route which took the Republic of Ireland from the poorest country in the EU (per head) to the richest. Scotland, it says, could match that performance.


Please note that I don't necessarily believe that "growth" is any kind of route to happiness or a fair and decent society. It's just useful data to help people develop an informed view of the debate.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
romanista
Member Avatar
Rick Lindeman

As one could wonder if the growth of ireland has that much to do with the tax rate of the celtic tiger
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
RevStu
Member Avatar
Laird/Beast Of Glencairn

http://www.scotlandoffice.gov.uk/freedom-o...lease.php?id=36

The infamous McCrone Report, which was classified as "secret" and suppressed by the Labour government in the mid-1970s when SNP support was rising. It was released in 2005 after an SNP request under the Freedom Of Information Act, as 30 years had passed.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/scotland/4238744.stm
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/scotland/4303750.stm

Quick highlights (and bear in mind all these figures are based on much lower oil prices than we have now):

Quote:
 
Oil and Revenue Values

"So far all that Ministers have said is that they expect North Sea oil to be yielding 70–100m. tons of oil per annum by 1980 and that on that basis the Government revenue from rent and royalties from the whole of the Continental Shelf …may be of the order of £100m per annum at that time." - Page 5

"The SNP have countered these figures by claiming that North Sea oil should by 1980 be yielding a Government revenue of approximately £800m."

By 1980, 80m tons of oil was indeed being extracted from the North Sea, but they were worth some £3,800m – some 38 times the Minister’s estimates. "All that is wrong now with the SNP estimate is that it is far too low." - Page 5

Scottish Prosperity with Oil and independence

"The net balance of payments gain might be expected to lie very approximately in the range of £2,000m to £3,500m a year, depending on prices and the share of the Government ‘take’." - Page 6

"What is quite clear is that the balance of payments gain from North Sea oil would easily swamp the existing deficit whatever its size and transform Scotland into a country with a substantial and chronic surplus." - Page 6

"The country would tend to be in chronic surplus to a quite embarrassing degree and its currency would become the hardest in Europe, with the exception perhaps of the Norwegian kroner." - Page 8

"An independent Scotland could now expect to have massive surpluses both on its budget and on its balance of payments and with the proper husbanding of resources this situation could last for a very long time into the future." - Page 16

"Thus, for the first time since the Act of Union was passed, it can now be credibly argued that Scotland’s economic advantage lies in its repeal." - Page 16

"Britain is now counting so heavily on North Sea oil to redress its balance of payments that it is easy to imagine England in dire straits without it… it is now likely that transfer of North Sea oil to Scottish ownership would occasion much bitterness in England if not an attempt to forcibly prevent it." - Page 17



"We English, who are a marvellous people, are really very generous to Scotland." - Margaret Thatcher in The Times, 12 February 1990.

"The oil price is likely to stay at about $10 to $12 a barrel at least in the foreseeable future. Therefore, we are worlds removed from the oil prices and production levels of the mid-1980s." - Donald Dewar (the first First Minister of the Scottish Parliament) to the Scottish Grand Committee, 1 February 1999

"We promised Iraq democratic government. We will deliver it. We promised them the chance to use their oil wealth to build prosperity for all their citizens, not a corrupt elite. We will do so." - Tony Blair speaking to US Congress, 18 July 2003.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Targaff
Member Avatar


RevStu
May 9 2008, 09:10 AM
"We English, who are a marvellous people, are really very generous to Scotland." - Margaret Thatcher in The Times, 12 February 1990.

If the intention of the thread is as a repository for pertinent facts why are they being punctuated with a left-right-left of "ironic" quotes? Facts speak for themselves, which is why there's not a great deal to be said to counter the data.

I do find one piece of wording in there a bit iffy, though: it strikes me that the revenue to the government (from rent, royalties and whatever else) could well be a wholly different thing to the oil's gross value. If that's the case, then the comparison of the latter against the estimates of the former is a fairly major piece of misdirection. I'd be curious to see how the different parties arrived at those figures, because at a glance the SNP's figure doesn't look like an unreasonable estimate of the revenue due on that amount of oil.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
RevStu
Member Avatar
Laird/Beast Of Glencairn

McCrone wasn't an incompetent goon - the figures quoted represent "Government revenue" specifically, not total commercial value. However, the price of oil suddenly rocketed in the mid-70s, as can be seen here:

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/comm...s_1861_2006.jpg

...tripling almost overnight as a result of the OPEC crisis of 1973, which nobody had been expecting at the time they made the original estimates quoted. The prices kept rising, peaking at over 10 times the pre-1973 price by the early 1980s, and stayed high for a decade, before falling somewhat (to prices that were still typically several times those of the pre-1973 figures) through the 1990s, then exploding upwards again after Bush and Blair's Iraq jaunt.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
RevStu
Member Avatar
Laird/Beast Of Glencairn

Targaff
May 9 2008, 10:28 AM
If the intention of the thread is as a repository for pertinent facts why are they being punctuated with a left-right-left of "ironic" quotes?

I find the habitual and epic-scale lying of Westminster and the Unionist parties with regards to an independent Scotland's economic prospects to be highly pertinent with regard to whether their statements can be trusted and believed over the coming year or two leading up to (it seems) the referendum vote. The idea that Dewar, for example, really believed that the oil price would remain stable at the freakish low point it very briefly hit in the late 90s is absurd - either he was Earth's biggest idiot, or was lying to try to forestall a surge in SNP support following the creation of the Scottish Parliament.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
aldo_14
Member Avatar
Remember remember

RevStu
May 9 2008, 09:39 AM
Targaff
May 9 2008, 10:28 AM
If the intention of the thread is as a repository for pertinent facts why are they being punctuated with a left-right-left of "ironic" quotes?

I find the habitual and epic-scale lying of Westminster and the Unionist parties with regards to an independent Scotland's economic prospects to be highly pertinent with regard to whether their statements can be trusted and believed over the coming year or two leading up to (it seems) the referendum vote. The idea that Dewar, for example, really believed that the oil price would remain stable at the freakish low point it briefly hit in the late 90s is absurd - either he was Earth's biggest idiot, or was lying to try to forestall a boost in SNP support following the creation of the Scottish Parliament.

As an aside, the oil price (crude, per barrel in US$ - so it's skewed by the weak $ perhaps) since 1947 / 1869;

Posted Image
Posted Image


1999 appears to be the lowest price and, whilst you could (tenuously) argue that the earlier periods in the 1st graph indicate oil could hold at a lower (compared to now) price, it seems bizarre to assume that OPEC wouldn't want to raise prices (as they did) and that cheap oil wouldn't equal more consumption and inflation.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
RevStu
Member Avatar
Laird/Beast Of Glencairn

Opinion poll data:

March 2008 poll on the simple yes/no referendum question currently being proposed by both main Holyrood parties (as opposed to a multi-choice referendum also including "increased powers within devolution"):
http://www.tns-global.com/corporate/Rooms/...A7970AE7B%5D%5D

41% for independence, 40% against

(December 2007 poll on same question: 40% for independence, 44% against)
(August 2007 poll on same question: 35% for independence, 50% against)

Swing in seven months: 16% to independence. You can see why Wendy Alexander doesn't want to wait any longer.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Targaff
Member Avatar


RevStu
May 9 2008, 09:33 AM
However, the price of oil suddenly rocketed in the mid-70s [...] tripling almost overnight as a result of the OPEC crisis of 1973, which nobody had been expecting at the time they made the original estimates quoted.

I wasn't suggesting that McCrone was incompetent, more that he knew how to play the numbers game. While the Government's estimates were clearly wildly inaccurate, for example (which I'm not disputing), it's then a facile argument to make that quoting figures that resulted from a crisis nobody could have predicted in a manner designed to make those estimates look that much worse is something of a, let's say, statistical exercise. Good for the goose and all that.

As for the quotes, it's not so much that they're irrelevant as that I don't really see that they bring anything more to the table "Parliament lies to further own ends" isn't really something specific to this issue and it's somewhat self-evident from the rest of the text. Not going to belabour the point if that's what you want to do, it just strikes me as a bit odd.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Anonymous X
Member Avatar


Stu, going back to the ASI report you quoted: "If an independent Scotland chose to follow the Republic of Ireland's low-tax route", etc. That would mean a significantly reduced welfare state compared to the UK as is now. As in really cut-to-the-bone. No proper public health system, as one example. I'd personally prefer an independent Scotland that was pro-welfare state with its oil money, ala Norway, etc. Things on current course, an independent Scotland will lose all the humane social advantages that Scotland currently has over England.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
RevStu
Member Avatar
Laird/Beast Of Glencairn

Like I said, I'm no fan of the Adam Smith Institute and its fundamentally Thatcherite ideology, just providing the information as a reference. But I think slashing welfare would be political suicide in Scotland, and Alex Salmond is a very clever man (and an economist by profession) - I'm sure he could come up with a sensible balance, helped by the fact that we have a multi-billion-pound resource that Ireland lacks.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
caleyjag
Member Avatar


I'd love to see an independent Scotland, though I feel we will have to get our finger out if we are to make it an attractive place for foreign businesses to invest. Too many workshy jakey neds walking the streets at the moment, although I'm not convinced it's more than the UK average.


Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Dave de Vil
Member Avatar
Crafty Bunny

How do things stand regarding Europe?
Remember that the UK is one of only two (with Germany) net contributors to the EU. Presumably if independent Scotland was economically succesful it'd continue to give more than it takes; BUT an England/UK rump without the Scots may well head towards withdrawal leaving the likes of Bulgaria and Spain to suck on the Caledonian's well-oiled tits.
Two can play at this game.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Steve S
Member Avatar


Dave de Vil
May 9 2008, 08:45 PM
How do things stand regarding Europe?
Remember that the UK is one of only two (with Germany) net contributors to the EU. Presumably if independent Scotland was economically succesful it'd continue to give more than it takes; BUT an England/UK rump without the Scots may well head towards withdrawal leaving the likes of Bulgaria and Spain to suck on the Caledonian's well-oiled tits.
Two can play at this game.

Did you have a point?

We've subsidised England for years. Should they withdraw we'd simply be subsidising someone else; I fail to see the drama.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Dudley
Member Avatar
In the angry dome.

Steve S
May 9 2008, 08:48 PM
We've subsidised England for years.

I'd be incredibly interested to see figures supporting this, even the most optimistic I've seen have it as a wash between oil revenue and Scotland's massive extra public spending per head.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
RevStu
Member Avatar
Laird/Beast Of Glencairn

It's not "massive extra". It's not even as much as London. And it's bigger than most parts of England because the country is so much more widely spread out.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
CdrJameson
Member Avatar
Andy Krouwel

RevStu
May 9 2008, 08:28 AM
Quote:
 
If an independent Scotland chose to follow the Republic of Ireland's low-tax route...Scotland's growth rate might be expected, over a five-year period, to move closer to Ireland's trend growth rate of 7 percent
...
We believe that the new research study shows just what can be achieved if countries choose to follow the low tax route to prosperity.

I don't think that's really got anything to do with Scotland per se, it's just the Adam Smith Institute plugging low taxes.

They're just saying country X will do better than country Y if it has lower taxes. The Scotland reference just gives it topicality.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Steve S
Member Avatar


Dudley
May 9 2008, 09:56 PM
Steve S
May 9 2008, 08:48 PM
We've subsidised England for years.

I'd be incredibly interested to see figures supporting this, even the most optimistic I've seen have it as a wash between oil revenue and Scotland's massive extra public spending per head.

The Gavin McCrone report of 1974 is the document you're looking for.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Dudley
Member Avatar
In the angry dome.

You're going to need something just a tad more recent than that.

You said "We've", not "In the past We".
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
RevStu
Member Avatar
Laird/Beast Of Glencairn

It's a good point, what with the price of oil having plunged so much in recent years.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Steve S
Member Avatar


Dudley
May 9 2008, 10:49 PM
You're going to need something just a tad more recent than that.

You said "We've", not "In the past We".

Blimey Dudley, it isn't like you to argue over pedantic minutiae.....oh, wait.

How about the Oxford Economics report of late 2007?
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
RevStu
Member Avatar
Laird/Beast Of Glencairn

Handy explanation in The Times, if anyone's been finding the events of the past week hard to follow:

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/poli...icle3904917.ece
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Dudley
Member Avatar
In the angry dome.

Steve S
May 9 2008, 11:15 PM
Dudley
May 9 2008, 10:49 PM
You're going to need something just a tad more recent than that.

You said "We've", not "In the past We".

Blimey Dudley, it isn't like you to argue over pedantic minutiae.....oh, wait.

How about the Oxford Economics report of late 2007?

Pedantic miniature? You made a massive, controversial statement and then backed it up with a 34 year old report, which you didn't even post.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
RevStu
Member Avatar
Laird/Beast Of Glencairn

Dudley
May 10 2008, 09:32 AM
Pedantic miniature? You made a massive, controversial statement and then backed it up with a 34 year old report, which you didn't even post.

Sigh. Try reading the quotes in the third post, under "Scottish Prosperity with Oil and independence", particularly the last two.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Dudley
Member Avatar
In the angry dome.

EDIT : Wait no, I might need that later, wouldn't want to see it get "lost".
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
Go to Next Page
« Previous Topic · This is WoS · Next Topic »
Add Reply

FEATURES . . . . . . ABOUT . . . . . . CONTACT . . . . . . SHOP . . . . . . RADIO WoS . . . . . . NEWS . . . . . . SUBSCRIBE . . . . . . WoS FRONT PAGE