FEATURES
. . . . .
ABOUT
. . . . .
CONTACT
. . . . .
SHOP
. . . . .
RADIO WoS
. . . . .
NEWS . .
. . .
SUBSCRIBE
. . . . .
WoSLAND
. . . . .
WoS FRONT PAGE
| Welcome to WoS Forums. We hope you enjoy your visit. You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board, it looks a bit ugly, and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
| Arguing with the internets; I am | |
|---|---|
| Topic Started: Jul 20 2010, 06:02 PM (13,813 Views) | |
| VinylPusher | Jul 20 2010, 06:02 PM Post #1 |
![]()
|
I get an email every time there's a new bit of hardware reviewed on benchmarkreviews.com. Recently, there was a review of a chair. A special chair designed by a special company. I read it. 8 pages of review which, to me, read more like an advert than a review. I would appreciate if the more learned amongst you (Stu especially) might cast a professional eye over the same: http://benchmarkreviews.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=562&Itemid=58 I am having the argument with the reviewer, Olin Coles, Executive Editor of benchmarkreviews.com. I commented on the article, quite bluntly stating that I thought it read like an advert, not an objective review (I was actually more facetious than that, but that's the summation of it). He's removed mine and his comments and he's emailed me instead. I've been known to be wrong before, but I would genuinely appreciate someone else's view. It's not as if I can win the argument, as an argument about opinion is fated to failure by default. Still, I want to know if I'm going barmy, at least. |
![]() |
|
| xbendystevex | Jul 20 2010, 06:12 PM Post #2 |
|
not that bendy really.
![]()
|
Bloody hell, that's just a cut and paste press release surely? That's certainly how it read to me, especially the first page. I once pointed out to Wired (via Twitter) that I wasn't impressed by their 8 page advert for the Tories that they tried to claim was an article a couple of months before the election, and that I would not be subscribing. The got really snippy in reply so I never bought the mag again. |
![]() |
|
| RevStu | Jul 20 2010, 06:47 PM Post #3 |
|
Laird/Beast Of Glencairn
![]()
|
No way in a million years was that written by anyone other than Herman Miller PR. And most likely someone from Herman Miller PR who has English as a second language. |
![]() |
|
| CraigGrannell | Jul 20 2010, 07:06 PM Post #4 |
![]()
Your thumping bass surrounds you
![]()
|
^^ What he said. |
![]() |
|
| Xeethra | Jul 20 2010, 07:09 PM Post #5 |
|
Flighty
![]()
|
I read most of the damnable thing (and a few other reviews to see what the site's norm was like) and agree with you, Mr. P. Though most of BmR's reviews seem to be very in-depth they do fall the other side of brochures. What concerned me most was the presentation of HM's claims about the health benefits of the chair without even a straw-man assault on them. The last two pages or so come close to an actual review but the first six are presented way too much like promo material. Most of them could have been condensed into a paragraph beginning "There's a lot you can do to customise your chair...". |
![]() |
|
| Ian Osborne | Jul 20 2010, 07:22 PM Post #6 |
![]()
|
I copied a random paragraph and pasted it into Google. Look what I found. Specifically, the middle hit. Check out that URL... |
![]() |
|
| VinylPusher | Jul 20 2010, 08:53 PM Post #7 |
![]()
|
I didn't think I was going barmy. I emailed Olin earlier today, keeping very reasonable and polite, but explaining why I stand by my comment and opinion. Perhaps a mini soap opera will ensue. I will keep you updated. If it's interesting. Thanks, guys. |
![]() |
|
| RevStu | Jul 20 2010, 08:57 PM Post #8 |
|
Laird/Beast Of Glencairn
![]()
|
What did they say to you? |
![]() |
|
| VinylPusher | Jul 20 2010, 09:07 PM Post #9 |
![]()
|
I got: -
|
![]() |
|
| CraigGrannell | Jul 20 2010, 09:07 PM Post #10 |
![]()
Your thumping bass surrounds you
![]()
|
Your next email should simply be: http://www.hermanmiller.com/MarketFacingTech/hmc/products/Embody_Chairs/Embody_Chairs_brochure.pdf *AHEM* |
![]() |
|
| RevStu | Jul 20 2010, 10:28 PM Post #11 |
|
Laird/Beast Of Glencairn
![]()
|
My comments have been deleted too. |
![]() |
|
| VinylPusher | Jul 21 2010, 06:15 AM Post #12 |
![]()
|
Wow. He's deleted your comments and made his own comment defending the article.
He's only gone and added a one-line disclaimer at the top of page 2 which reads: "Features Summary According to Herman Miller:" Part of my email to him, yesterday: '...I was looking for a sentence beginning "According to Herman Miller, Inc..." somewhere in those paragraphs.' What I was trying to get at, was that he has presented a swathe of text from the manufacturer entirely unchallenged within what is supposed to be an objective piece. Thus, "According to Herman Miller, Inc., this chair allows you to move in...." - which then should be challenged, evaluated and a conclusion made. Or something. I'm not a reviewer, so I'm not expert on these things. However, in the same way I'm not a gynaecologist, I still kinda know what something should look like without necessarily being a professional in the discipline. |
![]() |
|
| RevStu | Jul 21 2010, 06:28 AM Post #13 |
|
Laird/Beast Of Glencairn
![]()
|
Ooh, I got a reply!
Meanwhile, I haven't been able to access the review page for about six hours, in any browser - I get a 404. Other people have no problems, leading to the apparent conclusion that my IP address has been blocked. Apparently the page now DOES feature those additions, but silly old Benchmark Reviews have forgotten the existence of Google Cache, which clearly shows the previous version. Goodness me, how dishonest. I feel a feature coming on. |
![]() |
|
| RevStu | Jul 21 2010, 06:49 AM Post #14 |
|
Laird/Beast Of Glencairn
![]()
|
I've dropped Mr Coles a line.
|
![]() |
|
| VinylPusher | Jul 21 2010, 09:18 AM Post #15 |
![]()
|
I'm attempting to suppress laughter. My boss is wondering what I'm up to. The initial reply to my comment was along the lines "read the entire article before commenting". Clearly, Mr Coles is prone to being immediately and insultingly defensive when challenged. Those comments were, sadly, deleted. I wonder if he will amend the article further, or remove it entirely? By cripes, I haven't had a good internet argument for a number of years. It is most exciting
|
![]() |
|
| RevStu | Jul 21 2010, 10:19 AM Post #16 |
|
Laird/Beast Of Glencairn
![]()
|
http://wosblog.podgamer.com/2010/07/21/benchmark-reviews-busted-more-like/ |
![]() |
|
| Molloy | Jul 21 2010, 10:19 AM Post #17 |
![]()
|
What a disheartening insight into the corruptions at the heart of the office chair industry. After years of sitting on office chairs of varying quality over the years I've come to conclusion that they're all fucking horrible. Give me a solid, wooden chair with a straight back on it any day of the week. It's not as comfortable initially when you sit in it but after 8 hours you don't end up feeling like shit. Edited by Molloy, Jul 21 2010, 10:19 AM.
|
![]() |
|
| RevStu | Jul 21 2010, 10:45 AM Post #18 |
|
Laird/Beast Of Glencairn
![]()
|
Gosh, this seems awfully familiar: http://www.smartfurniture.com/products/Embody-Chair.html#Materials%20and%20Measurements |
![]() |
|
| xbendystevex | Jul 21 2010, 11:27 AM Post #19 |
|
not that bendy really.
![]()
|
Wow, good work everyone! When this is resolved perhaps the WoSBrain could try to work out what 'negative space' in chair filling material is. |
![]() |
|
| RevStu | Jul 21 2010, 11:30 AM Post #20 |
|
Laird/Beast Of Glencairn
![]()
|
I think it means it's made of dark matter. |
![]() |
|
| RevStu | Jul 21 2010, 11:50 AM Post #21 |
|
Laird/Beast Of Glencairn
![]()
|
Number of uses of the phrase "Herman Miller" in eight pages: 71. That's one every 64 words. For reference, this is how long 64 words is:
That's how much you can expect to read at a time before Olin Coles says "Herman Miller". "Embody" appears 104 times, or once every 44 words. This is 44 words:
5.4% of the entire review is taken up by the words "Herman Miller Embody". |
![]() |
|
| xbendystevex | Jul 21 2010, 11:55 AM Post #22 |
|
not that bendy really.
![]()
|
Someone should tell science. They'd probably want to know. |
![]() |
|
| VLII | Jul 21 2010, 12:05 PM Post #23 |
![]()
|
Hoorah! I mentioned this on the WoSBlog. I feel validated. Top tip for would-be web marketeers: spamming an article full of your top target short-tail keywords, particularly if it's your product name, is an obvious give-away. "Look honey, I searched for that chair on the Intergoogle and I got all these great reviews saying how awesome it is!" The Herman Miller Embody Chair kidnapped Madeleine McCann and gave me cat AIDS. |
![]() |
|
| VinylPusher | Jul 21 2010, 12:09 PM Post #24 |
![]()
|
Part of me wonders if Olin wrote the review about his personal purchase in order to gain preference with Herman Miller so that they would send him more stuff. Or he gets a slice of click-through sales. I don't know. Another part of me thinks that the Executive Editor fancied himself as a reviewer and just isn't good at it. |
![]() |
|
| VLII | Jul 21 2010, 12:12 PM Post #25 |
![]()
|
I think it was an intentional example of... well, for example, I'm frequently contacted to be asked "Would your company like a review posting up on our special site full of awesome companies like yours? Our copy-writers would be happy to write it, we just ask that you link back to us, and if you have a news section or blog yourselves, please write how excited you are to receive such a positive review from such a great site as ours!" Sometimes they even say "You can write it yourselves if you want" or "If you have a paragraph that you want adding, we can" or "Are there any particular terms you'd like us to really focus on?" Sometimes it's free, sometimes it costs money, sometimes it involves reciprocal links etc. I'm quite certain it's an example of this practice. |
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| Go to Next Page | |
| « Previous Topic · This is WoS · Next Topic » |












11:13 AM May 23