| Welcome to The South Pacific Forums. We hope you enjoy your visit. You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
| Daytime to Night | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: Mar 22 2010, 10:10 AM (144 Views) | |
| mavenu | Mar 22 2010, 10:10 AM Post #1 |
|
어머나!
![]()
|
Daytime to Night has declared for MoS on March 22.
|
![]() |
|
| Southern Bellz | Mar 22 2010, 02:20 PM Post #2 |
![]()
|
Will your WA nation be used in efforts to protect TSP? Will you put The South Pacific security above other interests you hold? Many paths have been taken in TSP Security, some focus on Intel, others focus on building an army. What is your path? Do you think TSP is able and ready to defend herself? If not what changes need to be taken to fix this? |
![]() |
|
| Daytime to Night | Mar 22 2010, 02:42 PM Post #3 |
![]()
|
My World Assembly nation generally splits its time between TSP and AWP and will continue to do so unless there are particular security concerns to attend to. Will you put The South Pacific security above other interests you hold? Certainly, the security of this region and every feeder is something that has always been close to my heart and my interests elsewhere reflect this as they complement this commitment to security in the South Pacific. Many paths have been taken in TSP Security, some focus on Intel, others focus on building an army. What is your path? I intend to focus on both, I don't intend to seek election to this position and then only do half a job by prioritising one area. I am experienced in both and plan to invest time in both areas. Do you think TSP is able and ready to defend herself? If not what changes need to be taken to fix this? I think TSP is fairly well prepared but our alliances are perhaps in need of a review, it has been mentioned elsewhere that we should be looking to build on relationships with active regions and I think this could greatly increase our security as a result and this is certainly something I would be looking to work through with the Minister of Foreign Affairs. |
![]() |
|
| kloister | Mar 22 2010, 06:07 PM Post #4 |
|
Fudgie's 'Fronk'...
![]()
|
Congratulations on accepting the nomination to run for a Cabinet position... Would you be able to expand on how you plan to work with the other elected Cabinet members to enhance the security of The South Pacific and it's members?.. Also do you have any thoughts on contingency planning in the event of security breaches or organised attacks?.. |
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| « Previous Topic · Minister of Security · Next Topic » |






9:44 AM Jul 11