| Welcome to The Adepts of Weyard forums. This is the community for The Adepts of Weyard, a Golden Sun fansite. People are welcome to hang out and chat with the rest of us. The forum is moderated by a staff which participates fully in the community. The chat box is also moderated by the friendly local djinni. Join our community! If you're already a member, log in and join the party! |
| The Wiki; ... | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: Feb 4 2010, 07:23 AM (281 Views) | |
| WitchRolina | Feb 5 2010, 11:05 AM Post #16 |
![]()
Sleepy Witch
|
I think wikia allows the creator of the wiki to set it up so that only people who have signed up can edit the wiki... If we can get that to happen, if someone tries it while signed in, we can just ban them. |
![]() |
|
| Stranger | Feb 5 2010, 11:56 AM Post #17 |
|
Geek Musketeer, Defender of Lulz
|
Banning is not always the perfect solution. |
![]() |
|
| WitchRolina | Feb 5 2010, 12:20 PM Post #18 |
![]()
Sleepy Witch
|
No, but it is the proper punishment. |
![]() |
|
| suzumebachi | Feb 5 2010, 02:44 PM Post #19 |
|
[post goddess]
![]()
|
But then you would be saying that anyone who is not a member should be punished... |
![]() |
|
| Raine Kaveri | Feb 5 2010, 03:03 PM Post #20 |
|
Angel
|
...You can't really punish someone who is NOT a member...>.> We wouldn't even know the person anyway. |
![]() |
|
| Phantom | Feb 5 2010, 03:16 PM Post #21 |
|
Self-proclaimed Sandslash
![]()
|
Well, if you're refering to guests, then, yeah, you can't punish them. If it's a staff member, (say, Moderator), then you could punish the person, since, technically that person isn't a member. S/he is a Mod. ;D |
![]() |
|
| Silverpine | Feb 5 2010, 07:20 PM Post #22 |
|
Hopeless Peasant, Greeter of Travellers, and Keeper of Hugs.
|
*coughwrongcough*
|
![]() |
|
| suzumebachi | Feb 5 2010, 07:46 PM Post #23 |
|
[post goddess]
![]()
|
...And then it got confusing, because Red changed his mind and Caz apparently told Alex her opinion... Or something. |
![]() |
|
| Silverpine | Feb 5 2010, 08:19 PM Post #24 |
|
Hopeless Peasant, Greeter of Travellers, and Keeper of Hugs.
|
*writes this all down for my Shakespearean epic, "TAOW - Wiki Whatchitmacallit?"* Comedy, or Tragedy? :P And here comes another reversal of opinion, at the last second... |
![]() |
|
| Stranger | Feb 5 2010, 10:10 PM Post #25 |
|
Geek Musketeer, Defender of Lulz
|
LAWL. I WILL PREEND IT DOESN'T EXIST FOR NOW ;D |
![]() |
|
| WitchRolina | Feb 6 2010, 12:37 AM Post #26 |
![]()
Sleepy Witch
|
No, actually, this prevents people who've not signed up to wikia from editing stuff. That's often a good thing, because of vandalism. It also lets us know who DID vandalize something or start the whole controversy BS in the first place, because they'd have to have a screen name on wikia to do it. Basically, this is something where, given that this is a community wikia, OUR community wikia, we don't want some random people going in and messing with it. We want to make sure we know it's us, and that if someone else goes and screws with it, we'll be able to not only fix it, but keep them from doing it again by banning them from editing the wiki. ...Or did you mean ban them from here? How will that help? Guests can't even post here anyways, can they? Anywho, you'd need to just kick them off of our wiki so that they don't mess with it again. And if y'all aren't signed up yet, do so. Otherwise we see your IP address, which means I can look it up, go to your house, and kill you. You sure you want that? And yes, iirc, the person who setup the wiki can make it so that anyone not logged into wikia cannot edit the wiki. They should do so. It will drop the vandalism by a LOT. As well as any 'controversy' that may pop up. >_> Edited by WitchRolina, Feb 6 2010, 12:39 AM.
|
![]() |
|
| Deleted User | Feb 6 2010, 06:46 AM Post #27 |
|
Deleted User
|
Less than 50% wanted it got rid of, and there was no choice that won by a substantial amount. Also, choices 1 and 2 were to keep the wiki, just in differant ways. So by your reasoning, 7-5. Anyway, it's all a moot point. The wiki was going to stay regardless of the poll. |
|
|
| suzumebachi | Feb 6 2010, 12:26 PM Post #28 |
|
[post goddess]
![]()
|
Anyways, I think we'll just leave the wiki as is, unless something bad happens. So, everyone! Be good and have fun! XD |
![]() |
|
| redragon 309 | Feb 20 2010, 09:46 PM Post #29 |
|
Master Venus Adept
|
Really Role, i want to HUG you!!! At least someone here knows what she is talking about. The whole point is to force guests to register and so if there is vandalism, we may block or ban the user from editing the wiki. So here is what i think the rules should be: 1) You must register on the wiki page to edit it. I mean c'mon its not fun to register if you don't get the credit right? 2) There will be no section about controversies. Honestly, this is what has gotten out of hand and causing the problem. 3) Any sight of vandalism will result in the blocking or banning of your account and IP address. 4) If you see any discrepancies on the wiki, contact any of the admin on the wiki page (like me and Alex) and we will resolve the issue. |
![]() |
|
| Deleted User | Feb 21 2010, 12:52 PM Post #30 |
|
Deleted User
|
Well said. |
|
|
| Go to Next Page | |
| « Previous Topic · Introduction · Next Topic » |
| Track Topic · E-mail Topic |
9:11 AM Jul 11
|





9:11 AM Jul 11