| We hope you enjoy your visit. You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
- Pages:
- 1
- 2
| Who are you aligned with | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: Apr 30 2008, 10:07 PM (414 Views) | |
| somerled | Apr 30 2008, 10:07 PM Post #1 |
|
Admiral MacDonald RN
|
No. |
| Offline | Profile | | Quote | ^ |
| Franko | May 1 2008, 12:15 AM Post #2 |
|
Shower Moderator
|
What exactly is a "neocon" ? I actually know, but I often find that many from the left don't. In fact, it's just a polite term for "fascist", as used in the current media and leftist intelligentsia. Plus no "other" option. Many may not be interested in this poll because of it's over-simplification. However, I'll allow it. |
| Offline | Profile | | Quote | ^ |
| Minuet | May 1 2008, 08:04 AM Post #3 |
|
Fleet Admiral Assistant wRench, Chief Supper Officer
|
Technically speaking "neo" conservative means new conservative. It originally referred to former liberals who changed their minds and became conservatives. Some of them became religiously zealous in their new mindset. Hence the perception of neo conservatives as extreme. A stupid label if you ask me. Just about as dumb as labeling anyone with liberal tendencies as a communist. I am not voting in the poll. |
| Offline | Profile | | Quote | ^ |
| Hoss | May 1 2008, 08:05 AM Post #4 |
![]()
Don't make me use my bare hands on you.
|
So, what do we call a liberal who is zealous religiously? Oh, it isn't right to assign labels, sorry I forgot. |
| Offline | Profile | | Quote | ^ |
| rowskid86 | May 1 2008, 08:08 AM Post #5 |
|
Suck my Spock
|
i think this thread is more of attempt to provoke some into a flame war. someone wants a few jabs at another |
| Offline | Profile | | Quote | ^ |
| Minuet | May 1 2008, 08:08 AM Post #6 |
|
Fleet Admiral Assistant wRench, Chief Supper Officer
|
"Religiously zealous" was not refering to religion per se. I was refering to the fervour that some showed for conservatism, not religion. "Religously" is a term used that way quite often. |
| Offline | Profile | | Quote | ^ |
| Hoss | May 1 2008, 08:10 AM Post #7 |
![]()
Don't make me use my bare hands on you.
|
either way. |
| Offline | Profile | | Quote | ^ |
| Minuet | May 1 2008, 08:13 AM Post #8 |
|
Fleet Admiral Assistant wRench, Chief Supper Officer
|
I seem to be missing your point 38957
|
| Offline | Profile | | Quote | ^ |
| 24thcenstfan | May 1 2008, 08:17 AM Post #9 |
|
Something Wicked This Fae Comes
|
Other.
|
| Offline | Profile | | Quote | ^ |
| RTW | May 1 2008, 08:18 AM Post #10 |
![]()
Vice Admiral
|
Geppetto lives! |
| Offline | Profile | | Quote | ^ |
| Hoss | May 1 2008, 08:21 AM Post #11 |
![]()
Don't make me use my bare hands on you.
|
So conservatives who actually do more than pay lip-service to their religious beliefs are labeled disparagingly by the left and I guess those who take their conservative political beliefs seriously are labeled disparagingly by the left. It's ok to use labeling and prejudicial language like that as long as it is against white conservative and/or christian guys. I mean we do want to celebrate diversity and inclusiveness and all that crap, right? |
| Offline | Profile | | Quote | ^ |
| Minuet | May 1 2008, 08:31 AM Post #12 |
|
Fleet Admiral Assistant wRench, Chief Supper Officer
|
I thought I made it clear that I think the label is wrong to use. I don't use the term "neo-conservative" ever because I think the original meaning has been totally lost. No one seems to understand what a real "neo-conservative" is. It is an insult now, rather then a term that simply means "new" to conservatism. Just as references to socialism show that people don't understand the differences between socialism and communism. Everything that doesn't fit thier own mindset is automatically "bad". That's why I am confused about your comment. It doesn't apply to me at all. I have always been, and remain, a centrist. I abhor the labels - the one applied from both sides. You seem sensitive about certain labels - but have you considered the ones the right throws out? Do you not get how ironic it is for some to be complaining about the labels when thier own side gives as good as it gets? |
| Offline | Profile | | Quote | ^ |
| Hoss | May 1 2008, 08:38 AM Post #13 |
![]()
Don't make me use my bare hands on you.
|
Forgive me, I wasn't directing my rant toward you, but more toward the topic starter. I should have made that clear. Yes, I have considered the ones that the right throws out as well. When I would call Hilary a socialist, I mean it sincerely. Not just idle name calling. I think that she is a socialist and somewhat tames her message down for political purposes. |
| Offline | Profile | | Quote | ^ |
| Minuet | May 1 2008, 08:40 AM Post #14 |
|
Fleet Admiral Assistant wRench, Chief Supper Officer
|
I seem to be missing the point of this comment too
|
| Offline | Profile | | Quote | ^ |
| Minuet | May 1 2008, 08:42 AM Post #15 |
|
Fleet Admiral Assistant wRench, Chief Supper Officer
|
Thanks for the explanation 38957. I agree about Hillary being socialist - but only if we are using the term in it's original meaning which is far removed from communism. I see socialism as something that can (and does) work in a democracy. |
| Offline | Profile | | Quote | ^ |
| Go to Next Page | |
| « Previous Topic · Politics and World Events Forum · Next Topic » |
- Pages:
- 1
- 2




9:31 AM Jul 11