| We hope you enjoy your visit. You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
| I'll tell you why you don't like Hillary; Mystery Solved | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: Apr 3 2008, 07:33 PM (498 Views) | |
| UncleSlickhead | Apr 3 2008, 07:33 PM Post #1 |
![]()
High Priest of the Church of the Blalock's Booty
|
So many Democrats (or more properly, so many Clintonites) find themselves dismayed by the fact that they just can't generate any love for Hillary Clinton as a presidential candidate. They loved Bill, so they can't understand why they just don't like Hillary. It's a great mystery to them. Well, people, your beloved Uncle Slickhead is here to tell you why you don't like Hillary. Are you sitting down? It's because there is absolutely nothing about her to like. She's obnoxious, conniving, deceitful, strident, and she smells like parmesan cheese. Remember that ad she ran that talked about the red phone ringing in the middle of the night, and who you'd want answering that call? If you didn't hate her before that ad, you should now. She's spent the better part of her young political career (more on that in a moment) decrying the fear-mongering of the Dubya administration, and then she pulls out a campaign ad like this. Call the kettle black much there, Ms. Pot? And let's not ignore the fact that the entire idea behind that ad is faulty to begin with. Hillary continually tells us how she is more experienced than Obama. Well, let's see; she's a second term senator, and Obama is a first termer. The experience issue is a wash. Besides, the last time I checked, Obama has just as much experience being president as Hillary does. Now Hillary wants us to believe that Obama is completely unable to do what is necessary to jumpstart our flagging economy. Really? You can't even manage your campaign's finances, Hillary, how do you plan on managing a national economy? For God's sake, woman, most of your campaign staff doesn't even have health insurance because of your financial ineptitude. How are you planning on getting healthcare for an entire country? At least Bill Clinton wanted to be a public servant. Hillary is not a public servant, she's a political windsock who just wants to be able to say she was the first woman president (even if she had to ride a man's coattails to do it). She's not an intellectual, a regular joe, or a born leader, she's a cipher. There is no substance to Hillary, you all see it, and you all know that this is not the time for the Democrats version of George W. Bush (which is exactly what Hillary is). That is why you don't like Hillary. |
| Offline | Profile | | Quote | ^ |
| Sgt. Jaggs | Apr 3 2008, 10:53 PM Post #2 |
|
How about a Voyager Movie
|
You are either 8247 or Neal Boortz!!!!!!!! One of earth's earliest species, Java Man, I believe he lives in Orlando. He is rather Impulsive if you get me. He made a thread about WTHeck is there so much hatred for the HILL. I ultimately believe she is a socialist. Look I bust my ass to put food on my family! Seriously, I break my behind to earn a good life for my family and it is tough. I am stiil on a 650 MGHZ pentium 2 PC I bought in 1999. My BED is a singularity waiting to happen it sinks in so much. I would like to have a PC that is up to date or a sleep number bed but I can't afford it right now. Someday I will earn it. For now I would rather spend my money on toys for my kids and food for the pantry. Now here comes two of my buddies Brian and Jose. They do not like to work. They admit it. They do not care. They do not keep jobs. They have the talent, the skill, the ability, I see it. They are about to get a promotion to store manager of a Walgreens store and they quit. Because
they did not want to come to work one day and ultimately got sick and tired of effort.They go from desparate situations to hopeless ones by quitting when stuff isn't even tough. Now you are going to tell me that you want to take from others to pay for his Lazy willfully Lazy unabashed behind? That is wrong. It is also wrong to pay people to stand on street corners. Every one of you who gives money to a guy on the street corner at the intersection have missed the larger point. Your compassion is reckless harmfull enablement. You have just made his life worse because he knows he can show up stand there and get a few bucks. You now have encouraged him to panhandle. In some cities the panhandlers are aggressive. They will accost you while you are putting gas in your car. I had a chicken head crack whore do that to me in Northwest Houston.I had another chicken head crack whore accost me in Dallas at a McDonalds drive thru. When I said sorry I don't got it, the chicken head Punched my car! While I am at it the death tax is Bullspit too. Socialism ultimately makes you and me and everyone lazy and worthless because we all know that at the end of the day we cannot achieve anything through or efforts that will not be taken by the socialist government. I guess that is why airplanes, cars, toilets, electric lights and phones all got created, because they could, because of capitalism. |
| Offline | Profile | | Quote | ^ |
| Franko | Apr 4 2008, 12:52 AM Post #3 |
|
Shower Moderator
|
Nice article, Slick. Your stuff is better than most of the pedantic columnists I wade through at Yahoo's news site. My disdain for Hillary (keep in mind that mine is a Canadian perspective, but I enjoy US politics more than my own) has nothing to do with her being a woman. For instance, I adore Condi Rice, and usually think highly about most of the "first lady's". However, to me, Hillary represents the now-somewhat stale aftertaste of a long stretch of the Bush/Clinton dynasty, now comprising the last 20 years. By sheer numerology, enough is enough. As well, I've always gotten the vibe that Hillary was more into the power trip and prestige of being president, albeit the first woman president, as opposed to actually believing that she has some grandiose vision of America. She intends to preserve the status quo with just more "social programs". As far as international affairs is concerned, I don't think she cares much about that. I've never been impressed with any of her "international" views, and her overall emphasis seems always on domestic issues. I think that Barak and McCain are more balanced that way, and they are both true moderates who will proceed carefully, but with a desire to influence the policies of the US in a manner they both believe will have positive and progressive effects. In this case, Barak may be the bolder of the two, but I do not believe that he will be reckless. He not only would be President, but also represent most of black America as president, which will keep him level-headed and sober. He's already committed himself to be a unifying leader, and I trust him more in foriegn affairs than I do Hillary. Both Obama and McCain will have a fresh and enthusiastic cabinet; with Hillary you can expect hacks. She and her cronies would be come the "neo=lib" counterpart to Bush's "neocons". I also don't believe that Obama is more "left" or "liberal" than Hillary. You heard it here first. In fact, I believe his presidency (if elected) will be pretty much centrist, even center-right, the same you will get from McCain. The last question left for McCain however, is whether or not America may decide that this time it is "No Country For Old Men". |
| Offline | Profile | | Quote | ^ |
| RTW | Apr 4 2008, 01:54 AM Post #4 |
![]()
Vice Admiral
|
|
| Offline | Profile | | Quote | ^ |
| somerled | Apr 4 2008, 03:09 AM Post #5 |
|
Admiral MacDonald RN
|
Well , since some people have actually been voting for her that makes your hypothesis no good. Some people seem to like her enough to vote for her over the Obama. |
| Offline | Profile | | Quote | ^ |
| RTW | Apr 4 2008, 03:38 AM Post #6 |
![]()
Vice Admiral
|
:rolleyes: For some reason a quote from the movie "A Fish Called Wanda" comes to mind.
|
| Offline | Profile | | Quote | ^ |
| ds9074 | Apr 4 2008, 05:00 AM Post #7 |
|
Admiral
|
In terms of time spent in an elected office surely Obama has actually served the public longer, as he was a State Senator for 7 years wasnt he? |
| Offline | Profile | | Quote | ^ |
| somerled | Apr 4 2008, 06:01 AM Post #8 |
|
Admiral MacDonald RN
|
You'll have to refresh our memory as it's been a very long time seen I saw that very funny movie. |
| Offline | Profile | | Quote | ^ |
| Minuet | Apr 4 2008, 08:10 AM Post #9 |
|
Fleet Admiral Assistant wRench, Chief Supper Officer
|
This is one area where I find myself disagreeing with you Franko. I don't trust him more. Maybe it is because I have a "vested interest" in what happens in the middle east. Obama is a Christian but he comes from a Muslim heritage and has many Muslim relatives. I and a lot of other Jews are actually quite concerned about a shift in mideast policy with an Obama presidency. The Clintons have always been strong supporters of Israel. |
| Offline | Profile | | Quote | ^ |
| somerled | Apr 4 2008, 08:17 AM Post #10 |
|
Admiral MacDonald RN
|
.... where has he admiitted or stated directly or otherwize he is a muslim , or of muslim heritage, or is any less pro-Israel than any other prior or possible president of the USA ? I read somewhere that his father was Kenyan and was raised as Muslim, but becme an atheist by the time Obama's parents met, and his Indonesian stepfather as not tied to any religion either. And being a parishioner of a christian church (with a outspoken priest) is not an indication that he is anti-Israel either. Basing your opinion of him on his name is pretty petty and paranoid. A shift in mid east policy by the USA would actually be a positive thing for global security , what the USA has been doing lately has not worked or been constructive. |
| Offline | Profile | | Quote | ^ |
| STC | Apr 4 2008, 08:24 AM Post #11 |
![]()
Commodore
|
Minuet you obviously know more about Obama's thoughts, leanings, polcies etc. on the Middle East than I do. But, just a general thought. A U.S. President with the background you ascribe to Obama might just be what is needed - someone who can empathise with both sides and act as a 'bridge' between the two might be in a better position to help negotiate a lasting peace. |
| Offline | Profile | | Quote | ^ |
| 24thcenstfan | Apr 4 2008, 08:58 AM Post #12 |
|
Something Wicked This Fae Comes
|
I’m not a Democrat, but USH hit on several concerns that I have about Hillary Clinton. I have yet to decide if she should get my vote in November. Or McCain or Obama. Its up in the air right now. Also, for anyone expressing irrational fear about Obama based on his Muslim family heritage, I’m going to recommend a visit to Barack Obama’s website. Obama's position on Israel. His position on the Middle East in general seems to be one of toughness, but fairness. |
| Offline | Profile | | Quote | ^ |
| Minuet | Apr 4 2008, 09:22 AM Post #13 |
|
Fleet Admiral Assistant wRench, Chief Supper Officer
|
Somerled, if you continue to twist my words and lie about what I say I will be reporting you to the moderators. You have claimed here that I made statements I did not say. That is baiting and you are already on thin ice with the moderators for this. Either take the time to read my thoughts carefully and respond to what I actually did say or please get the hell out of my way and don't respond to me at all. I have no desire to fight with you or anyone else. |
| Offline | Profile | | Quote | ^ |
| Minuet | Apr 4 2008, 09:26 AM Post #14 |
|
Fleet Admiral Assistant wRench, Chief Supper Officer
|
I expressed concern, not "irrational fear". They are not the same thing. Please watch the inflammatory comments. |
| Offline | Profile | | Quote | ^ |
| Minuet | Apr 4 2008, 09:36 AM Post #15 |
|
Fleet Admiral Assistant wRench, Chief Supper Officer
|
Actually I don't know a lot more. What I expressed was a concern about a possibility. It may not be totally grounded in reality and I said up front that my comments were based on my own personal concerns about a subject that is near and dear. All I am really saying is that the Clintons already have a track record of being friends to Israel, where Obama is a bit more of a blank slate that I don't know about. I was down in the US visiting my sister-in-law a short time ago and did get a bit of information about how the Jewish community is reacting to Obama. I am not speaking for everyone by a long shot, but I am passing on comments that I heard expressed by some. |
| Offline | Profile | | Quote | ^ |
| Go to Next Page | |
| « Previous Topic · Politics and World Events Forum · Next Topic » |



Because
I had a chicken head crack whore do that to me in Northwest Houston.


9:32 AM Jul 11