| We hope you enjoy your visit. You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
- Pages:
- 1
- 2
| If Jackie was your daughter , sister, niece.... | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: May 11 2007, 03:10 AM (329 Views) | |
| somerled | May 11 2007, 03:10 AM Post #1 |
|
Admiral MacDonald RN
|
![]() |
| Offline | Profile | | Quote | ^ |
| ~Luthien~ | May 11 2007, 03:34 AM Post #2 |
|
Little Sister Of Sistertrek
|
i voted who is jackie. Dont know the girl in the first place. Second; i know guys generally prefer some girl with a little more meat on her. She looks anorexic. Poor girl |
| Offline | Profile | | Quote | ^ |
| captain_proton_au | May 11 2007, 03:53 AM Post #3 |
![]()
A Robot in Disguise
![]()
|
Professional cheerleader for one of the teams in the NFL, her salary is probably bigger than most here |
| Offline | Profile | | Quote | ^ |
| Spanky | May 11 2007, 04:34 AM Post #4 |
|
Insanely Handsome Guy
|
She does look anorexic... So it's obvious what I voted, even though I don't know who she is. |
| Offline | Profile | | Quote | ^ |
| whitestar | May 11 2007, 05:17 AM Post #5 |
|
Captain
|
phone number. Looks perfectly healthy to me, slim is the word, not anorexic. Cant see rib bones on her upper torso or even protruding hip bones on the lower torso, enough flesh there, her face is not gaunt. Her thighs look full and strong, very strong. And she seems well endowed in the chest region, anorexic victims bodies consume the fat of there own body to sustain themselves when deprived of proper food. Female breasts contain much fat and is one of the first areas that begins to shrink as the body consumes itself. I doubt hers are shrinking She looks like a healthy young women to me. |
| Offline | Profile | | Quote | ^ |
| Mel | May 11 2007, 05:27 AM Post #6 |
|
Coffee Lover
|
You can't see rib bones on her cos she was probably photoshopped to look that way on the photo. I always wonder how there is room for organs when someone is that skinny. :rolleyes: |
| Offline | Profile | | Quote | ^ |
| somerled | May 11 2007, 05:37 AM Post #7 |
|
Admiral MacDonald RN
|
She's a string bean.... Looks way too skinny , she would be getting fed plenty of beef, roast lamb and other goodies in an attempt to fatten her a wee bit, and she would be watched closely to ensure she wasn't spewing it up. |
| Offline | Profile | | Quote | ^ |
| whitestar | May 11 2007, 06:00 AM Post #8 |
|
Captain
|
probably, could have, maybe, but all i got is this pic, show me the "uncropped" pic and I'll comment on that one. Dont look far different from an olympic track athlete, a female at their peak in life and fitness...never hear anyone critizise an olympic track athlete for being too skinny |
| Offline | Profile | | Quote | ^ |
| Dandandat | May 11 2007, 08:24 AM Post #9 |
|
Time to put something here
|
I vote other, Jackie is fine she does not look sickly and most likely makes more money then I do just for wearing those skimpy clothing. Where she my daughter, sister, niece I would be happy for her. We should remember that beginning a cheerleader is not the same as being a model. They must be physically fit and able to perform extraneous activities. I very much doubt that a cheerleading coach would allow an unhealthy person on their squad just for appearances sake. Sure appearance gets you the job, but if you can’t perform you aren’t keeping it. |
| Offline | Profile | | Quote | ^ |
| HistoryDude | May 11 2007, 09:02 AM Post #10 |
![]()
Shaken, not stirred...
|
Other - Disappointed that she'd pose in skimpy clothing to be broadcast world-wide on the internet like some trophy or eye-candy. Even more disappointed that it was via Maxim, though I admit there is worse. |
| Offline | Profile | | Quote | ^ |
| Minuet | May 11 2007, 09:07 AM Post #11 |
|
Fleet Admiral Assistant wRench, Chief Supper Officer
|
And breasts can be artifically enhanced. |
| Offline | Profile | | Quote | ^ |
| hamuchi | May 11 2007, 09:32 AM Post #12 |
![]()
power nerd
|
I prefer girls with more meat on them (isn't that interesting, since I've got eatingdisorders), so I think she's to thin but I mean it's not Nicole Richie disgustingly thin. Maybe she's just naturally thin, what do I know. The outfit is just.. Not good looking imo.. |
| Offline | Profile | | Quote | ^ |
| captain_proton_au | May 11 2007, 10:04 AM Post #13 |
![]()
A Robot in Disguise
![]()
|
Uh Huh....hmmmm....someone's projecting. She looks to be at ideal weight for her height. She's healthy and gorgeous, good on her |
| Offline | Profile | | Quote | ^ |
| somerled | May 11 2007, 10:31 AM Post #14 |
|
Admiral MacDonald RN
|
Wonder how much she paid to look like that ? |
| Offline | Profile | | Quote | ^ |
| Sophie | May 11 2007, 11:02 AM Post #15 |
|
Keeper of the spider-cats
|
I voted for the first one, but Who's Jackie applies also |
| Offline | Profile | | Quote | ^ |
| Go to Next Page | |
| « Previous Topic · Ten Forward · Next Topic » |
- Pages:
- 1
- 2








7:59 PM Jul 10