Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]
We hope you enjoy your visit.


You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free.


Join our community!


If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features:

Username:   Password:
Add Reply
*** SisterTrek Monthly! ***; Issue 5
Topic Started: May 31 2005, 01:44 PM (1,203 Views)
Fesarius
Member Avatar
Admiral
^^^
Thanks, CP. I was just curious what you really thought of the film. :)
Offline | Profile | Quote | ^
 
gdog243
Rear Admiral
captain_proton_au
Jun 3 2005, 04:48 PM
gdog243
Jun 2 2005, 03:55 PM
I'm the only one who reviewed Episode III.  Come on people. ;)

Yes, I sent off 8 Pm's, only you replied.

I was going to put my own in, but it would have been too harsh, I'm still fairly upset about how bad it was

I guess now that the hype is starting to pass, there are more people coming out saying that ROTS wasn't as good as previously thought. I've been reading a bunch more negative reviews on it the last few days, even though I still really enjoyed it. I think what I didn't like about it is the original trilogy had some great chemistry between the characters that was sorely lacking in the prequal. The dialog and acting also wasn't as good, but I liked it because it did a great job tieing into the originals.
Offline | Profile | Quote | ^
 
captain_proton_au
Member Avatar
A Robot in Disguise

gdog243
Jun 8 2005, 05:47 PM

I guess now that the hype is starting to pass, there are more people coming out saying that ROTS wasn't as good as previously thought. I've been reading a bunch more negative reviews on it the last few days, even though I still really enjoyed it. I think what I didn't like about it is the original trilogy had some great chemistry between the characters that was sorely lacking in the prequal. The dialog and acting also wasn't as good, but I liked it because it did a great job tieing into the originals.

I think it also has something to do with the AotC's comparison.

III was good compared to AotC's, or put another way, it was a big relief that III wasnt as bad
Offline | Profile | Quote | ^
 
Data's Cat's Sister
Member Avatar
Commodore
captain_proton_au
Jun 9 2005, 03:41 PM
gdog243
Jun 8 2005, 05:47 PM

I guess now that the hype is starting to pass, there are more people coming out saying that ROTS wasn't as good as previously thought.  I've been reading a bunch more negative reviews on it the last few days, even though I still really enjoyed it.  I think what I didn't like about it is the original trilogy had some great chemistry between the characters that was sorely lacking in the prequal.  The dialog and acting also wasn't as good, but I liked it because it did a great job tieing into the originals.

I think it also has something to do with the AotC's comparison.

III was good compared to AotC's, or put another way, it was a big relief that III wasnt as bad

I thought it was OK, better then the other new ones, but most of the acting was terrible.
Offline | Profile | Quote | ^
 
Generic Redshirt
Member Avatar
Captain
Great issue everyone.


I would have filled in the survey Proton but I still haven't seen it yet (I will get around to it) :sorry:
Offline | Profile | Quote | ^
 
Generic Redshirt
Member Avatar
Captain
Opps double post :sorry: my first one too.
Offline | Profile | Quote | ^
 
« Previous Topic · Ten Forward · Next Topic »
Add Reply

Tweet
comments powered by Disqus