| We hope you enjoy your visit. You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
| Canada says NO to Islamic tribunals | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: May 26 2005, 05:19 PM (181 Views) | |
| Dwayne | May 26 2005, 05:19 PM Post #1 |
|
Profanity deleted by Hoss
|
|
| Offline | Profile | | Quote | ^ |
| Dwayne | May 26 2005, 05:19 PM Post #2 |
|
Profanity deleted by Hoss
|
I hope Fatima Houda-Pepin has body guards. |
| Offline | Profile | | Quote | ^ |
| Minuet | May 26 2005, 06:04 PM Post #3 |
|
Fleet Admiral Assistant wRench, Chief Supper Officer
|
Dwayne your title is incorrect. It should read that Quebec says no. This was not decided in the Federal legislature and I know for a fact that it is still being discussed in Ontario. I honestly cannot speak for the other provinces. By the way - just a little background on the application of Sharia law. If passed in Ontario the agreement is that Ontario and Canadian law still take precedence. It would be only be used to settle domestic disputes. And the reason it is being looked at so seriously is that there are already precedents. Native Canadians have thier own tribunal and Jews also have a religious court that can help decide certain domestic issues (divorce settlements, etc...) I haven't made up my mind about this yet. Due to what happens in Islamic countries I must admit to a certain preconceived prejudice that does not totally trust that the tribunal will be fair. But then I recognize the inherent unfairness of allowing some ethnic groups this right and not others. I think that as long as this tribunal (and those of the other ethnic groups) are supervised carefully to ensure compliance with Canadian law then possibly it could work just as well as it has for other groups. |
| Offline | Profile | | Quote | ^ |
| Minuet | May 26 2005, 06:05 PM Post #4 |
|
Fleet Admiral Assistant wRench, Chief Supper Officer
|
I am transfering this thread to Sistertrek International as it is about Canada, not the US. |
| Offline | Profile | | Quote | ^ |
| 24thcenstfan | May 26 2005, 06:49 PM Post #5 |
|
Something Wicked This Fae Comes
|
So do I. If the backlash is anything like it was for Ayaan Hirsi Ali in Amsterdam, then she will need them. I just hope no extremists come out of the word work and take threatening action against Houda-Pepin. Never hurts to take precautions though. |
| Offline | Profile | | Quote | ^ |
| Franko | May 26 2005, 10:53 PM Post #6 |
|
Shower Moderator
|
It will be interesting to see what Canadian "feminists" have to say about this. Shariah law isn't known for it's pro-female bias. |
| Offline | Profile | | Quote | ^ |
![]() ZetaBoards gives you all the tools to create a successful discussion community. Learn More · Sign-up Now |
|
| « Previous Topic · SisterTrek's "Headlines from Around the World" · Next Topic » |



2:05 PM Jul 11