| We hope you enjoy your visit. You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
- Pages:
- 1
- 2
| Fox ratings plummet; loose 58% of viewers since election | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: May 25 2005, 09:07 AM (230 Views) | |
| Dr. Noah | May 25 2005, 09:07 AM Post #1 |
|
Sistertrek's Asian Correspondant
|
Fox News Viewership Falls 58% Since Election by bonddad Wed May 18th, 2005 at 20:31:45 PDT April '05 marks "the sixth consecutive month where FNC declined versus prior month in M-F, primetime P25-54 (every month since Nov '04)," CNN's press release says. The 25-54 demo is coveted by advertisers. One insider called it a "downward spiral." FNC still has more demo viewers than CNN, though (443k vs. 304k in April). Here are FNC's month-by-month weekday primetime averages in the 25-54 demographic: Oct. 04: 1,074,000 / Nov. 04: 891,000 / Dec. 04: 568,000 / Jan. 05: 564,000 / Feb. 05: 520,000 / March 05: 498,000 / April 05: 445,000 This is a 58% drop in 6 months Also: In April 2005, FNC's weekday primetime demo average decreased 25% compared to the year-ago, while CNN increased 27% From the TVNewser |
| Offline | Profile | ^ |
| Dwayne | May 25 2005, 09:25 AM Post #2 |
|
Profanity deleted by Hoss
|
BFD It's just further proof that when Americans want the news, for example during a major election, they want to go to a source that's not reflexively anti-American and anti-republican. But now that the election is over, people are not as concerned with the news, so they are watching less of it. Mark my words, if something major happens in the world to warrant large numbers of people watching the news and that news could be spun negatively against the United States, then you'll see increases in FoxNews viewship again. |
| Offline | Profile | ^ |
| 24thcenstfan | May 25 2005, 09:28 AM Post #3 |
|
Something Wicked This Fae Comes
|
^^Not necessarily. The American viewers could have simply loved the graphics and other pretty pictures FNC showed during the election. Ultimately, and possibly, they didn't deem the channel worthy enough to stick around afterwards. |
| Offline | Profile | ^ |
| Admiralbill_gomec | May 25 2005, 09:28 AM Post #4 |
|
UberAdmiral
|
How about a link to a source, Noah. Also, in your zeal to attempt to flame Fox News Channel, did you check the ratings for CNN during the same time? How about CBS News, for that matter?
|
| Offline | Profile | ^ |
| gvok | May 25 2005, 09:31 AM Post #5 |
|
Unregistered
|
What about the neat war graphics when the US invaded Iraq? |
| ^ | |
| Dr. Noah | May 25 2005, 09:32 AM Post #6 |
|
Sistertrek's Asian Correspondant
|
I'll leave that for you AB.
|
| Offline | Profile | ^ |
| Admiralbill_gomec | May 25 2005, 09:33 AM Post #7 |
|
UberAdmiral
|
Nope. You post the flame, you back it up. Fair's fair. |
| Offline | Profile | ^ |
| Dr. Noah | May 25 2005, 09:34 AM Post #8 |
|
Sistertrek's Asian Correspondant
|
Who's flaming? You don't consider this news? You brought up ratings for other networks, you post them. BTW: I believe my article states a rise in CNN viewership. |
| Offline | Profile | ^ |
| 24thcenstfan | May 25 2005, 09:35 AM Post #9 |
|
Something Wicked This Fae Comes
|
Those were excellent too.
|
| Offline | Profile | ^ |
| Admiralbill_gomec | May 25 2005, 09:36 AM Post #10 |
|
UberAdmiral
|
Where was your original source? Too lazy to post a link? |
| Offline | Profile | ^ |
| gvok | May 25 2005, 09:36 AM Post #11 |
|
Unregistered
|
Noah, I don't think you flamed at all. You simply posted information. Flaming is specifically directed at another person. At least that's how I see it. |
| ^ | |
| Dr. Noah | May 25 2005, 09:36 AM Post #12 |
|
Sistertrek's Asian Correspondant
|
I don't think you need to get offensive so early do you? It wasn't laziness, it was simple forgetfulness. But I think the article is sourced by FCC figures. I don't think I am flaming anyone. This is a news article.
|
| Offline | Profile | ^ |
| Hoss | May 25 2005, 09:41 AM Post #13 |
![]()
Don't make me use my bare hands on you.
|
I have watched every American new channel (excluding CBS, what's the point) during coverage of the wars and election. They all had lots of over-dramatic music and flashy graphics. They were worse than attack of the clones in this respect. I don't see how one out did any of the others. Another thought, does the same company that owns the CNN channels also own one of the largest cable companies in the US? For some strange reason, I get CNN with my current cable package, but not Fox News Channel, MSNBC or any of the others.
|
| Offline | Profile | ^ |
| Fesarius | May 25 2005, 09:51 AM Post #14 |
|
Admiral
|
Dwayne, Short for Bruce F. Dern? |
| Offline | Profile | ^ |
| Wichita | May 25 2005, 10:27 AM Post #15 |
|
The Adminstrator wRench
|
Administrative Response Closed for TOS violation. The original poster failed to give credit to the article writer, was reminded of it, and still chose not to do so. My hands are tied .... End of Administrative Response |
| Offline | Profile | ^ |
| Go to Next Page | |
| « Previous Topic · Politics and World Events Forum · Next Topic » |
- Pages:
- 1
- 2


2:07 PM Jul 11