Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]
We hope you enjoy your visit.


You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free.


Join our community!


If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features:

Username:   Password:
Add Reply
Global Warming Twice as Bad as Previously Thought
Topic Started: Jan 27 2005, 09:32 AM (512 Views)
Dwayne
Profanity deleted by Hoss
somerled
Jan 29 2005, 01:39 AM
Dwayne
Jan 29 2005, 12:34 AM
somerled
Jan 29 2005, 12:13 AM
Oh . So you didn't follow the brief discussion on solving and parametrising PDEs and BVPs ? That only indicates your knowledge of calculus and physics is woefully inadequate , and you really don't have a clue.

Another somberlad red herring and more proof you're egotistical.

It's so sad you have to play these little pathetic games.

Some of us are actually interested in discussing the topic , so how about either saying something relevant or refraining from trying to bait people .

Wicheta - are you going to council Dwayne on this or are you going to permit his nonconstructive posting to persist ? Many of us are getting pretty bored and pissed off with his tactics.

:rotfl: :rotfl: :rotfl: :rotfl:
Oh really, is this how you discuss the topic???

In an attempt to show the scare mongering going on, I make the point that this is not one study resulting in a predicted 11c increase, but just one set of results amongst many, "This isn't a study that says the temps will rise 11c, but a series of individual studies in which one predicted a 11c increase in temps."

And then you go off trying to argue some inane point about the variations in results, which was totally off topic and really was the red herring.

Offline | Profile | Quote | ^
 
somerled
Member Avatar
Admiral MacDonald RN
Looks like Dwayne is trying to have yet another thread that he doesn't like locked. :evil1:
Offline | Profile | Quote | ^
 
Admiralbill_gomec
UberAdmiral
Or it looks like you're attempting to distract in another thread so others miss your specious arguments.

By the way, you seem to have missed something in your large posted graphic... the word "Simulated" at the bottom.
Offline | Profile | Quote | ^
 
somerled
Member Avatar
Admiral MacDonald RN
Admiralbill_gomec
Jan 29 2005, 10:58 AM
Or it looks like you're attempting to distract in another thread so others miss your specious arguments.

By the way, you seem to have missed something in your large posted graphic... the word "Simulated" at the bottom.

No I didn't miss the word simulated.

Simulations using models that are tuned properly to reflect the physicality of a scenario are a perfectly acceptable means of investigating and forecasting complicated situations.
Offline | Profile | Quote | ^
 
« Previous Topic · Politics and World Events Forum · Next Topic »
Add Reply

Tweet
comments powered by Disqus