Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]
We hope you enjoy your visit.


You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free.


Join our community!


If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features:

Username:   Password:
Add Reply
Was it a hate crime?
Topic Started: Jan 16 2005, 02:37 PM (769 Views)
Dwayne
Profanity deleted by Hoss
somerled
Jan 25 2005, 09:13 AM
Is what you have been saying factually based or based on evidence that has come to light regarding the case, or just another application of your normal dwaynisms to this - ie heresay, speculation and really just a load islamophobic bullsh1t ?

Where is the actual evidence that it was indeed a religion motivated crime ?

Have the investigating cops said this is actual motive and all other lines of investigation have come to naught ?

I can't be too hard on you ... after all, you spell like a third grader and you have a difficult time comprehending plain English. I started my comments at the very beginning of this thread with the words, "If proven". So really, you have no point nor argument.
Offline | Profile | Quote | ^
 
somerled
Member Avatar
Admiral MacDonald RN
Dwayne
Jan 25 2005, 09:26 AM
somerled
Jan 25 2005, 09:13 AM
Is what you have been saying factually based or based on evidence that has come to light regarding the case, or just another application of your normal dwaynisms to this - ie heresay, speculation and really just a load islamophobic bullsh1t ?

Where is the actual evidence that it was indeed a religion motivated crime ?

Have the investigating cops said this is actual motive and all other lines of investigation have come to naught ?

I can't be too hard on you ... after all, you spell like a third grader and you have a difficult time comprehending plain English. I started my comments at the very beginning of this thread with the words, "If proven". So really, you have no point nor argument.

Nor do you. Just more Dwaynisms as per normal practice.

And another sidestep and attempt to distract people's attention from the pertinant questions.

Offline | Profile | Quote | ^
 
Admiralbill_gomec
UberAdmiral
Did you actually READ what you posted earlier (the article I linked)?

The police are searching for a motive, and they keep coming back to a ritualistic killing. It won't take long before forensics gives more details.

Offline | Profile | Quote | ^
 
somerled
Member Avatar
Admiral MacDonald RN
Admiralbill_gomec
Jan 25 2005, 10:24 AM
Did you actually READ what you posted earlier (the article I linked)?

The police are searching for a motive, and they keep coming back to a ritualistic killing. It won't take long before forensics gives more details.

That was mentioned a possible motive and not yet dismissed, nor is robbery (the place was ransacked and all money's and valuable taken.

You are selectively choosing only those parts of the story that fit your "hypothesis" why might that be ? :chin: :rumor:
Offline | Profile | Quote | ^
 
Admiralbill_gomec
UberAdmiral
Once again, you saw only what you wanted to see.

Motive, possible motive. You're splitting hairs to defend a possible hate crime.
Offline | Profile | Quote | ^
 
Dwayne
Profanity deleted by Hoss
somerled
Jan 25 2005, 11:07 AM
the place was ransacked and all money's and valuable taken.

You are selectively choosing only those parts of the story that fit your "hypothesis" why might that be ?

That's far better than you ... you selectively make up cr@p to fit your argument.

The only thing taken was money ... no valuables.
Offline | Profile | Quote | ^
 
somerled
Member Avatar
Admiral MacDonald RN
Admiralbill_gomec
Jan 25 2005, 12:07 PM
Once again, you saw only what you wanted to see.

Motive, possible motive. You're splitting hairs to defend a possible hate crime.

I am not supporting what the criminals did to those unfortunate victims. I am saying the motive for the crime is not yet clear and the police have not yet determined why the crime happened.

But that doesn't support your islamophobic/christofascist agenda does it ? (==> ABG and his very good chum Dwayne).
Offline | Profile | Quote | ^
 
Dwayne
Profanity deleted by Hoss
somerled
Jan 26 2005, 12:46 AM
But that doesn't support your islamophobic/christofascist agenda does it ? (==> ABG and his very good chum Dwayne).

Learn to read.

"If proven that this man and his family were murdered as a result of on-line conversations..."
Offline | Profile | Quote | ^
 
Admiralbill_gomec
UberAdmiral
^^^ Thank you, Dwayne.
Offline | Profile | Quote | ^
 
Dwayne
Profanity deleted by Hoss
^^^
NP
Offline | Profile | Quote | ^
 
ZetaBoards - Free Forum Hosting
Fully Featured & Customizable Free Forums
Learn More · Sign-up Now
« Previous Topic · Politics and World Events Forum · Next Topic »
Add Reply

Tweet
comments powered by Disqus