| We hope you enjoy your visit. You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
| Jihadist terrorists | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: Jan 10 2005, 07:50 AM (2,294 Views) | |
| cptjeff | Jan 16 2005, 12:13 AM Post #61 |
|
Captain of the Enterprise-J
|
and I gave my reasons- it was a cut and paste twisting of sentences and meanings, changing the entire makeup. you quote a sentence of the dulfer report- to claim that saddam had weapons. may I refer you here? well, I guess that answers that question. and that was the primary logic in the entire thing. with that blown to smithereens, I suggest that you work on something productive. like preparing a defence for an Impeachment trial for Bush. Edited for vulgarity. Cptjeff stick to the topic. Only people who have no argument resort to vulgarities. |
| Offline | Profile | ^ |
| Dwayne | Jan 16 2005, 02:31 AM Post #62 |
|
Profanity deleted by Hoss
|
You didn't give reasons; all you gave were lies and diversions. You lie by stating I used the Duelfer Report to "claim that saddam had weapons", when in fact I cited the Duelfer Report under a section titled Undermining the Legitimacy of the UN Sanctions. This is the second time you've tried this and this is the second time I'm point it out. As well, you lie by trying to argue ... ineffectually I might add ... that my writings are twisted cut-n-pastes. And you do all this without providing a shread of supporting evidence. Much like somerled, you simply make statements and then you think everyone else is supposed to accept it out of hand because you arrogantly think you're smarter than everyone else. On top of the lies are a host of diversions. You tried to divert this to an argument whether or not Iraq had nuclear, biological or chemical weapons, when in fact the essay I wrote isn't about that at all; the essay I wrote is about Iraqs place in the War on Terrorism. In addition to that, you also tried to divert this to an argument of an impeachment of Pres. Bush. |
| Offline | Profile | ^ |
| somerled | Jan 16 2005, 09:32 AM Post #63 |
|
Admiral MacDonald RN
|
And that somehow justifies invading a country, destroying their infrastructure and killing a great many Iraqis ? |
| Offline | Profile | ^ |
| doctortobe | Jan 16 2005, 11:49 AM Post #64 |
|
Speak softly, and carry a 57 megaton stick!
|
That's a loaded question. |
| Offline | Profile | ^ |
| Admiralbill_gomec | Jan 16 2005, 01:26 PM Post #65 |
|
UberAdmiral
|
Nothing like a closed mind, is there? You might learn something, even if it might upset your applecart. |
| Offline | Profile | ^ |
| Admiralbill_gomec | Jan 16 2005, 01:26 PM Post #66 |
|
UberAdmiral
|
So you'd prefer if Saddam Hussein was still in power? |
| Offline | Profile | ^ |
| Admiralbill_gomec | Jan 16 2005, 01:29 PM Post #67 |
|
UberAdmiral
|
Why? He has done nothing impeachable. In fact, his actions are saving American lives by keeping the fight over there than on the streets of Anytown, USA. Have you thought of that (better Baghdad than Boston)? |
| Offline | Profile | ^ |
| Dwayne | Jan 16 2005, 02:17 PM Post #68 |
|
Profanity deleted by Hoss
|
Saddam killed more Iraqi's per month than the total that have died as a result of invading Iraq, so your comments, like Jeff's are a mere diversion from the truth. And the truth is, yes the invasion was justified. |
| Offline | Profile | ^ |
| cptjeff | Jan 16 2005, 08:20 PM Post #69 |
|
Captain of the Enterprise-J
|
one simple question- How? Saddam as evil by our standards, yes, but what applies to us does not always apply to the rest of the world? How many times do I have to tell you that? Saddam hated Terrorists, and he didn't allow them in. Now what is Iraq? a breeding ground. the man had his flaws, but what so does everybody. and with the no WMDs, there might be an impeachment (ya know, for lieing to congress for war autoraization...) stay tuned... |
| Offline | Profile | ^ |
| Admiralbill_gomec | Jan 16 2005, 08:28 PM Post #70 |
|
UberAdmiral
|
Not only are you clueless, you're a friggin' apologist for the Hitler of our times!! Saddam isn't evil (this is a man who has killed HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS) by whose standards? You are saying that we shouldn't apply our values to him? Kid, this is by far the STUPIDEST thing you have EVER said. The man had TORTURE CHAMBERS. He fed people into plastic shredding machines. He dripped acid on people. He had them thrown off of five story buildings. The man had his flaws?? Jesus X. Christ!!! As for the lack of WMDs, your hero Bill Clinton said they existed. Your other hero John Kerry said they existed. Both are on tape and on record saying they are. So, just who lied to Congress? NO ONE! This was based on the intelligence we had. Note to moderator: The post directly above mine may be sufficient reason to suggest Invisionfree raise its lower age limit.
|
| Offline | Profile | ^ |
| doctortobe | Jan 16 2005, 08:53 PM Post #71 |
|
Speak softly, and carry a 57 megaton stick!
|
Based on his track record for attempting to be knowledgeable on things (nuclear weapons, evolution) I would say that this is par for course for jeffy boy. You know, Stalin wasn't that bad either, neither was Hitler. They were just misunderstood. |
| Offline | Profile | ^ |
| Dwayne | Jan 16 2005, 11:53 PM Post #72 |
|
Profanity deleted by Hoss
|
A little something from the Timesonline that will spice things up...
|
| Offline | Profile | ^ |
| Admiralbill_gomec | Jan 17 2005, 09:30 AM Post #73 |
|
UberAdmiral
|
Yes, we have to understand the root causes of their penchant for evil. After all, Hitler's daddy spanked him, so that probably made him want to exterminate an entire race of people. Stalin had a last name no one could pronounce (Djugashvili). I'm sure that drove him to purge millions he saw as a threat... because people could pronounce their last names. Saddam had prematurely gray hair and talked like Sylvester the Cat. This probably made him want to kill 300,000 people and dump their bodies in mass graves... thufferin' thuccotash! |
| Offline | Profile | ^ |
| benetil | Jan 17 2005, 01:00 PM Post #74 |
|
Unregistered
|
I won't dignify any of the Islamist terrorists (al-Qaeda, Hamas, Hizballah, Ansar Al-Islam, Al-Fatah, et al.) by calling them freedom fighters. The second option that incorporates the term thug comes closer to the way I feel about them. There seem to be elements of resignation and hopelessness tangled in the bizarre 'motives' of the people who commit acts of terror. It makes me feel a little sad for them, but that is about all of the compassion or understanding that I can muster for them. |
| ^ | |
| somerled | Jan 17 2005, 09:17 PM Post #75 |
|
Admiral MacDonald RN
|
You are kidding , aren't you ? Those can't possibility be your serious and concidered opinions on why Hitler and Stalin became mass murders , and by the way nothing has been proven yet about Saddam . |
| Offline | Profile | ^ |
| Go to Next Page | |
| « Previous Topic · Politics and World Events Forum · Next Topic » |

You are kidding , aren't you ? 
9:45 AM Jul 11