| We hope you enjoy your visit. You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
| Sistertrek Bush Approval Poll | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: May 24 2004, 12:47 PM (992 Views) | |
| Cool Vulcan | May 24 2004, 05:11 PM Post #31 |
|
Captain
|
I approve Mr. Bush, even more since Kerry flip lops, and contridices everything. I am govk I have to agree with Admirlbill. |
| Offline | Profile | | Quote | ^ |
| Fesarius | May 24 2004, 05:19 PM Post #32 |
|
Admiral
|
Tavener, First you were Gabe, then Tavener, and now Gvok? Please, I can't keep them all straight!!!!!
|
| Offline | Profile | | Quote | ^ |
| Cool Vulcan | May 24 2004, 05:21 PM Post #33 |
|
Captain
|
Am I? You tell me. Do I look like Govk? |
| Offline | Profile | | Quote | ^ |
| 24thcenstfan | May 24 2004, 05:27 PM Post #34 |
|
Something Wicked This Fae Comes
|
I disapprove, and I will not be voting for Bush in November. |
| Offline | Profile | | Quote | ^ |
| Sgt. Jaggs | May 24 2004, 05:29 PM Post #35 |
|
How about a Voyager Movie
|
Now how bout that Spit? You got your arse kicked for that poll? Gvok hows that taste? :lol: Some of you need to take a valium or something! :lol: No wait, this is too funny let it continue!
|
| Offline | Profile | | Quote | ^ |
| benetil | May 24 2004, 05:30 PM Post #36 |
|
Unregistered
|
Disapprove - utterly and completely. I've never disapproved more of any (USA) political leader than I disapprove of President George W. Bush. This man and his administration have caused so much turmoil and instability in the world, so much social dissention and division in the USA that conditions are much worse now than in 2000. It is time for that zealous little ideologue to retire to his little brush farm in Texas - the sooner the better - better for the USA, better for the world. While he's in Texas, former President Bush can declare a war on evil brush - and he can charge out on a unilateral mission to rid his land of evil brush. I think he'd be quite happy to wage that war. |
| | Quote | ^ | |
| Dr. Noah | May 24 2004, 05:40 PM Post #37 |
|
Sistertrek's Asian Correspondant
|
You never know what those treatcherous prairie dogs could be hiding in those holes. |
| Offline | Profile | | Quote | ^ |
| Fesarius | May 24 2004, 05:40 PM Post #38 |
|
Admiral
|
Gabe, I was responding to your having said that you were Govk. I don't know what you (or Govk) look like, truth be told. And I promise not to stalk you.
|
| Offline | Profile | | Quote | ^ |
| Dwayne | May 24 2004, 05:53 PM Post #39 |
|
Profanity deleted by Hoss
|
How friggen pathetic. It amazes me how Bush Bashers utter these moronic opinions without any consideration for Sept. 11th and the global "turmoil and instability" that terrorist act caused. People like you are the ideologues, because Pres. Bush is doing nothing different in this War on Terror than what Mr. Clinton did in Kosovo ... after all, there was no UN resolutions for that military action either. You're a partisan, plain and simple. |
| Offline | Profile | | Quote | ^ |
| Sgt. Jaggs | May 24 2004, 05:55 PM Post #40 |
|
How about a Voyager Movie
|
Sad. The only Turmoil Bush has caused is to the world of the Terrorist. He has made them pay, and I like that! |
| Offline | Profile | | Quote | ^ |
| benetil | May 24 2004, 06:05 PM Post #41 |
|
Unregistered
|
Dwayne - there is no comparison to what the USA did (or what President Clinton did, as you say) in former Yugoslavia and what the USA has done in Iraq. No comparison. President Bush has strayed from arresting and punishing the people who perpetrated the attacks of 9/11/2001. I believe he (Bush) will pay for his derelict detour in Iraq with his job (lose the election). Please don't post a bunch of White House maps that try to show why Iraq was the best next step to locating and punishing Osama bin Laden for 9/11 - I just don't buy it. |
| | Quote | ^ | |
| benetil | May 24 2004, 06:12 PM Post #42 |
|
Unregistered
|
I know many people approve of what the President has done - I think his job approval rating is somewhere in the 45% range (45% of respondents seem to approve of the job that the President is doing). I don't blame President Bush for the attacks of 9/11. I do blame him (Bush) for urgently plunging us into Iraq. I see little in the way that Iraq is directly connected to al-Qaeda. I hold him (Bush) accountable for what has happened in Iraq - |
| | Quote | ^ | |
| Dwayne | May 24 2004, 06:12 PM Post #43 |
|
Profanity deleted by Hoss
|
1. Those were not "White House maps". Those were maps I developed myself. 2. The War on Terrorism was never an attempt to get Osama bin Laden, but an attempt to break the web of alliances and support between state sponsors of terrorism and global terrorist networks. 3. Neither Clinton's military actions in the Balkans or Mr. Bush's action in Iraq had UN approval. 4. I don't give a flying F what you buy ... the fact is this, arresting or killing Osama bin Laden would not change a thing, because this problem goes way beyond Osama bin Laden and al Qaeda ... that was the point of my lengthly post with the maps ... obviously a point you didn't understand. |
| Offline | Profile | | Quote | ^ |
| Dwayne | May 24 2004, 06:22 PM Post #44 |
|
Profanity deleted by Hoss
|
Mr. Bush announced in January of 2002 that Iraq would be part of a global war on terrorism in his "Axis of Evil" speech. Mr. Bush then spent the next 13 months trying to get friend and foe alike to pressure Saddam Hussein to fully and openly cooperate with the UN by totally abiding by relevant UN resolutions. Then your ilk totally ignores the fact that the al Qaeda - Iraq connection that the Bush Administration argued was that al Zarqawi was in Iraq and Hussein was allowing him to stay, then you totally ignore the fact that it is Zarqawi that is behind much of the violence now seen in Iraq. Your opinions are just not based in fact ... your opinions are based in liberal talking points and Michael Mooresh type conspiracy thoeries. |
| Offline | Profile | | Quote | ^ |
| Wichita | May 24 2004, 06:24 PM Post #45 |
|
The Adminstrator wRench
|
Personal Response I'd be interested in hearing what program that was as well. I am well aware that some African farmers have been displaced by US corporations (Starbucks being one of the major ones). Thanks to my International Economics professor who lived there for years, I heard that story firsthand, but I haven't heard of the government program.
I would be interested to hear what you think of England's supposed plan to refuse to turn over materials or allow their officials to testify at Sadaam Husseins' trial if the Iraqi tribunal (which they helped set up) even considers the death penalty as a possibility.
Having read the Mideast Road Map, I am confused by this statement.
That's covered by the World Trade Organization. It's not possible for him to take action on it unilaterally. That issue has been resolved now.
As I recall 95 out of 100 US senators considered the Kyoto Treaty too flawed to sign. He wasn't alone. I would be much more impressed by that effort if I didn't know that some of the nation signatories hadn't themselves exported their dirtiest industries to 3rd world nations themselves.
Dwayne covered that one well.
Not really sure what you mean about that one, but the WTO agreements, NAFTA, and the other one that I can never remember regulate how imports and exports are handled. End of Personal Response |
| Offline | Profile | | Quote | ^ |
| Go to Next Page | |
| « Previous Topic · Politics and World Events Forum · Next Topic » |



8:54 AM Jul 11