Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]
We hope you enjoy your visit.


You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free.


Join our community!


If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features:

Username:   Password:
Add Reply
Transfer of Iraqi Sovereignty
Topic Started: May 19 2004, 12:50 PM (287 Views)
Swidden
Member Avatar
Adm. Gadfly-at-large; Provisional wRench-fly at large
Well, from what I understand it will still be an interim group running the show until elections are held (planned for January next year, last I heard). I expect that on June 30th control will go to the CPA until elections can be put together...
Offline | Profile | Quote | ^
 
24thcenstfan
Member Avatar
Something Wicked This Fae Comes
Well it would appear that an interim Iraqi President hasn't been chosen yet, but will be in the next two weeks. This whole turnover has struck me as being rushed and showing a lack of preparation. I hope all goes well for everyone’s sake.


Bush Rushing to Show Iraq Handover Strategy

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - An interim Iraqi president, prime minister and other top ministers should be selected in the next two weeks, President Bush said on Wednesday as he prepared to lay out for the American public his strategy for handing sovereignty to Iraqis.

Rushing to stem eroding support at home and abroad for his Iraq policies, Bush discussed with his Cabinet and Italian Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi plans for what he called a "full transfer of sovereignty" to an Iraqi interim government on June 30 backed by a new U.N. Security Council resolution.

Berlusconi came to Washington to press Bush to give Iraqis more say over their security forces and military facilities after the handover. While Berlusconi suggested there was a broad consensus, senior Bush administration officials said the interim government would have limited authority in some areas and Iraqi forces, while overseen by fellow Iraqis, would still fall under a U.S.-led command.

In a public address next week, Bush plans to lay out in more detail the course for the remaining month and a half before the scheduled transfer, administration officials said.

Spreading violence and a prison abuse scandal have pushed the president's approval ratings to new lows and he is eager to show Americans he is on top of the situation with time running out before the handover deadline.

Officials said Bush would discuss his Iraq plans when he meets privately with fellow Republicans on Capitol Hill on Thursday.

Bush said he expected decisions to be made in the next two weeks on who will become the new Iraqi prime minister and president, and assume the two positions of deputy president.

Berlusconi proposed an international conference on Iraq be held before elections in January.

He also suggested the president of the interim Iraqi government visit New York in July to meet members of the U.N. Security Council and representatives from coalition member countries.

"It's a very convincing plan," said the Italian leader, a leading ally in the U.S.-led occupation of Iraq. "We agreed on all of these future possibilities."

U.N. RESOLUTION

Bush is increasingly confident of winning support for a new U.N. resolution that would recognize the interim government, even though details about its makeup and authority have yet to be settled.

White House spokesman Scott McClellan said he expected action "soon" on the resolution. Washington wants it passed before June 30. McClellan said U.N. envoy Lakhdar Brahimi will also "come back with some names for that interim government soon."

Bush is trying to counter growing concerns inside and outside his administration that the occupation is failing and that he has no strategy to improve the situation.

At G8 talks last week, the foreign ministers of major industrialized countries challenged the United States to transfer real power to Baghdad in the handover.

France, which last year blocked U.N. approval of the U.S. invasion, said Washington must give up control over local forces, while Italy said a new government must have a say over American troop tactics.

Bush administration officials have said the Iraqis would have responsibility for administering the country on June 30, the official end of the occupation.

But they want security to stay under the leadership of the United States, and regulations promulgated by the Coalition Provisional Authority may stay in place until elections in January 2005.

U.S. Deputy Secretary of State Richard Armitage told Congress earlier this week that Iraqi troops, although under U.S. command, would be permitted to opt out of any operation.

Bush plans to shift control of oil revenues and the Iraq Development Fund to the new Iraqi leadership, officials said.

End Article
Offline | Profile | Quote | ^
 
Swidden
Member Avatar
Adm. Gadfly-at-large; Provisional wRench-fly at large
24thcenstfan
May 19 2004, 08:47 PM
Well it would appear that an interim Iraqi President hasn't been chosen yet, but will be in the next two weeks. This whole turnover has struck me as being rushed and showing a lack of preparation. I hope all goes well for everyone’s sake.

This is what we get for responding to international pressure for not being quick enough in turning over power to the Iraqi's sooner rather than later.
Offline | Profile | Quote | ^
 
24thcenstfan
Member Avatar
Something Wicked This Fae Comes
Swidden
May 19 2004, 11:51 PM
24thcenstfan
May 19 2004, 08:47 PM
Well it would appear that an interim Iraqi President hasn't been chosen yet, but will be in the next two weeks.  This whole turnover has struck me as being rushed and showing a lack of preparation.  I hope all goes well for everyone’s sake.

This is what we get for responding to international pressure for not being quick enough in turning over power to the Iraqi's sooner rather than later.

I can't remember what I initially thought of the June 30 turnover, but I know what I think of it right at this moment. It is too soon. Ideally, this should be happening a minimum of one year from now. There are just too many loose ends in Iraq right now (fighting still going on, gov’t institutions are barely if even established to name two). This is a bad situation.


Edit: This is wild. I was curious as to what my initial thoughts were about the turnover in Iraq so I went and dug up this...LINK

I initially said something very similar to what I said tonight (in my first and second reply). Then I found out the exact turnover date, and I became a bit more optimistic knowing the troops would remain in Iraq after the turnover. I am still experiencing the same mixture of thoughts I did in November.
Offline | Profile | Quote | ^
 
gvok
Unregistered

doctortobe
May 19 2004, 03:43 PM
It would not be as damaging as it would happen under the Iraqis' watch instead of the Coalitions'.The Iraqis would not take too kindly to ANYBODY killing their country's leader once that leader has real authority.

But you're just guessing. I'd prefer to have official statements on which to base my opinion.

24 - Thanks for posting the article.
| Quote | ^
 
Minuet
Member Avatar
Fleet Admiral Assistant wRench, Chief Supper Officer
It looks like a leader has been chosen. This was on the front page of my paper today.

Shahristani likely to be Iraq's first PM
Offline | Profile | Quote | ^
 
« Previous Topic · Politics and World Events Forum · Next Topic »
Add Reply

Tweet
comments powered by Disqus