Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]
We hope you enjoy your visit.


You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free.


Join our community!


If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features:

Username:   Password:
Add Reply
BREAKING NEWS - WMD; Exploded roadside bomb contains Sarin
Topic Started: May 17 2004, 09:44 AM (1,094 Views)
somerled
Member Avatar
Admiral MacDonald RN
Impulse :
Quote:
 
Lack of reporting (if true) in the BBC and ABC only indicates that they haven't yet chosen to report it. It doesn't automatically invalidate the story like you want to believe. They may just be waiting on test results or something else before deciding on the importance of the story.

I'll concede that may the case.

Quote:
 
Something was found and legitimately believed to be mustard gas. Beyond that, I haven't heard any test results for proof.
Presuming there was actually a recent find.

The Sarin find was made public quickly , so why not the alleged Mustard Gas find ?
Vague claims by the reporter , who beats about the bush and wont give concrete details (even if the find is only suspected to be Mustard Gas) or provide the identity of his source sounds very sus to me.

Bill:
Quote:
 
is that you are in DENIAL.
:rotfl: :loling: :rotfl: Who's in denial ?
Offline | Profile | Quote | ^
 
Admiralbill_gomec
UberAdmiral
You are presented with facts, AGAIN and AGAIN, and yet you still won't believe. Why? Because your little anti-Bush world would rapidly crumble around your shoulders. WMDs would mean yet another reason for going to war, which would make your whole premise obsolete.

Your problem is that you built your whole argument out of sand. You being the authority on everything should know the stability of something built with so unstable a material.
Offline | Profile | Quote | ^
 
8247
Member Avatar
Apparently we look like this now
I just have to wonder what the NY Times, or Dan Rather, or any other "unbiased" media outlet would say if someone walked into their office and poured a gallon of some chemical agent on the floor. Would they then report it as "just a minimal amount?" I think not.

The 3 liters of sarin gas if properly dispersed, could kill thousands of people.

EDIT: Remember the Anthrax scare? Point proven.

IDIOTS :realmad:
Offline | Profile | Quote | ^
 
somerled
Member Avatar
Admiral MacDonald RN
How about this for an explanation

Warning: This one is a bit nasty.

Posted Image ??



This one is good too Posted Image

Somerled: Post warnings BEFORE, not after, the "nasty" cartoons. Wichita
Offline | Profile | Quote | ^
 
8247
Member Avatar
Apparently we look like this now
Those cute little cartoons didnt answer my question. Look at the dates. 2003...before WMD's were found. What's next?
Offline | Profile | Quote | ^
 
somerled
Member Avatar
Admiral MacDonald RN
8247:
Back on a serious note.

Providing it is still fresh , Sarin (an organophosphate) is also very unstable chemically and it's effectiveness deminishes almost exponentially the longer it is stored or kept laying about.

The report sited earlier in this thread also said this and that the agent which was dispersed was ineffective due to it's age - lucky for those soldiers.

Offline | Profile | Quote | ^
 
8247
Member Avatar
Apparently we look like this now
^^^^

Several soldiers were affected by it, and required treatment. There could be a major chemical weapons attack over there, and we'd never hear it on the 6:00 news, or newspapers...unless you watch Fox news.
Offline | Profile | Quote | ^
 
Admiralbill_gomec
UberAdmiral
Facts don't matter to Somerled. I believe he just bought a larger shovel to dig himself into a deeper hole.
Offline | Profile | Quote | ^
 
somerled
Member Avatar
Admiral MacDonald RN
Bill :
:loling: :loling: :rotfl:

And you can talk.
Offline | Profile | Quote | ^
 
Admiralbill_gomec
UberAdmiral
I can back up EVERYTHING I say. You post cartoons. Yeah, I see an equivalent there, troll boy.
Offline | Profile | Quote | ^
 
24thcenstfan
Member Avatar
Something Wicked This Fae Comes
8247
May 21 2004, 03:46 AM
Those cute little cartoons didnt answer my question. Look at the dates. 2003...before WMD's were found. What's next?

See I think that might be part of the problem...Somerled seems to get most of his "news" from outdated comic strips.

Offline | Profile | Quote | ^
 
8247
Member Avatar
Apparently we look like this now
Admiralbill_gomec
May 21 2004, 10:17 AM
I can back up EVERYTHING I say. You post cartoons. Yeah, I see an equivalent there, troll boy.

Cartoons that bear NO relevance whatsoever. His cartoons didnt answer my question....

Quote:I just have to wonder what the NY Times, or Dan Rather, or any other "unbiased" media outlet would say if someone walked into their office and poured a gallon of some chemical agent on the floor. Would they then report it as "just a minimal amount?" I think not.

The 3 liters of sarin gas if properly dispersed, could kill thousands of people.

EDIT: Remember the Anthrax scare? Point proven.
Offline | Profile | Quote | ^
 
« Previous Topic · Politics and World Events Forum · Next Topic »
Add Reply

Tweet
comments powered by Disqus