| We hope you enjoy your visit. You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
| BREAKING NEWS - WMD; Exploded roadside bomb contains Sarin | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: May 17 2004, 09:44 AM (1,097 Views) | |
| Admiralbill_gomec | May 18 2004, 01:44 PM Post #46 |
|
UberAdmiral
|
Oh for Christ's sake, get over yourself!! Fabricated a story? Yeah, right. You just REFUSE to believe that you're wrong, and also REFUSE to admit it. You have defined the word "clueless" downward. |
| Offline | Profile | | Quote | ^ |
| Minuet | May 18 2004, 01:56 PM Post #47 |
|
Fleet Admiral Assistant wRench, Chief Supper Officer
|
Howard seeks further details on sarin explosion Wrong again! Check the times for both stories yourself. This one was apparently posted just after 11:00am (that's in the morning!) your time on Tuesday.
What a crock of BS. You don't want to be wrong so you assume the story is fabricated. |
| Offline | Profile | | Quote | ^ |
| ANOVA | May 18 2004, 06:41 PM Post #48 |
|
Vice Admiral
|
OK Somerled... What does yuor luandry list of organic chemiclas prove? Item eight (8) on your laundry list of organic chemicals was "chemical weapons manufacture. Meaning that Mustard Gas would fall into this catagory.
Sarin should have also been on the list since it is A) an organophosphate B) a chemical weapons gas (OK, technically a vapor or mist) MY BIG WORRY If the terrorists found one and we announced it contained Sarin. Didn't we just tell them to go back to the stockpile and extract the gas from the explosive to disperse in a more effective means. Luckily few cropdusters exist in the area. ANOVA For every fact, there is an opposite and equal lie. (Newtons first law of rehtoric) |
| Offline | Profile | | Quote | ^ |
| Sgt. Jaggs | May 18 2004, 07:33 PM Post #49 |
|
How about a Voyager Movie
|
Damn!!!! I should have thought of that! Thanks for the thought. Are two people really a group though? ***light bulb goes off........ damn...... a group would be very gay!* :lol: |
| Offline | Profile | | Quote | ^ |
| ANOVA | May 18 2004, 07:43 PM Post #50 |
|
Vice Admiral
|
JS You need the manly pat on the back with a knowing nod of the head. Wait, we don't have a smiley for that. THESE SMILES ARE GAY But in a Rock Hudson sort of way not a Truman Capote sort of way. ANOVA |
| Offline | Profile | | Quote | ^ |
| doctortobe | May 18 2004, 08:34 PM Post #51 |
|
Speak softly, and carry a 57 megaton stick!
|
I have seen articles on both the BBC and ABC websites. I would think that the fact that they released an article on one forum and not on another that is more open to the public would be the bigger question. Would they put these articles on their websites if they were not credible? As to the credibility of the article, it has been widely reported on many different American networks with left leaning views. It was not just FOX. And if Howard, Blair, Bush, or Rumsfeld were to gain any political points for this, the best they could do is to have their people call the news agencies about it. Last I heard, America had a free press. I assume it is the same with Britain and Australia. They can't force news agencies to do much of anything. |
| Offline | Profile | | Quote | ^ |
| Minuet | May 18 2004, 09:26 PM Post #52 |
|
Fleet Admiral Assistant wRench, Chief Supper Officer
|
Well, what do you expect on a website started by and run by a woman! BTW to women a group hug is NOT gay Niether is this
|
| Offline | Profile | | Quote | ^ |
| Dandandat | May 18 2004, 10:17 PM Post #53 |
|
Time to put something here
|
Hey I wouldn’t mind group hugging a group of woman ether! that doesn’t make me gay does it? |
| Offline | Profile | | Quote | ^ |
| Sgt. Jaggs | May 18 2004, 10:30 PM Post #54 |
|
How about a Voyager Movie
|
You are right. Didn't Capote wear pink? We need a thumbs up type of smiley, meybe evena 'right turn clyde' smiley for "The Fist!" |
| Offline | Profile | | Quote | ^ |
| 24thcenstfan | May 18 2004, 10:42 PM Post #55 |
|
Something Wicked This Fae Comes
|
Well, before AB tells us all that we are completely :offtopic: Here are a few slightly more manly smilies: Hand shake: ![]() Side Hug Squeeze: ![]() High Five:
|
| Offline | Profile | | Quote | ^ |
| 8247 | May 18 2004, 10:54 PM Post #56 |
|
Apparently we look like this now
|
:offtopic: |
| Offline | Profile | | Quote | ^ |
| somerled | May 19 2004, 12:27 AM Post #57 |
|
Admiral MacDonald RN
|
Minuet : I don't want to burst your bubble but - Howard was referring to that old Sarin shell that was rigged up as mine , and NOT to any Mustard Gas finds. That is what we are talking about - the alleged find of a Mustard Gas munition made by Fox, but STILL not reported by BBC or ABC or ANY ( A N Y ) Australian networks. How many times have Fox been first to report as a headline WMD finds were discredited or found to be something else? - I wonder if they take the time to check their sources thoroughly , and how much of their reporting is ratings driven ? They are certainly politically driven. If both Sarin and Mustad Gas munitions had really been unearthed then that's a huge story and it with the elections in the UK, USA and Australia coming up soon it would be surely be getting more coverage if there was anything in it. |
| Offline | Profile | | Quote | ^ |
| somerled | May 19 2004, 12:40 AM Post #58 |
|
Admiral MacDonald RN
|
:offtopic: footy players (you pick the code) have frequent 's. No-one would think that they are a bit "odd" ![]() or would they ? Careful what ball ya grab mate ! The guy at the back with the white headband on is very eliquant - he's saying " Grrrrrrr!!!!!!" |
| Offline | Profile | | Quote | ^ |
| somerled | May 19 2004, 01:58 AM Post #59 |
|
Admiral MacDonald RN
|
Anova : That is a list of organics which are multiple use. As far as I can determine Sarin has ONLY one use and has no legitimate (EDIT [strike]non-military[/strike]) uses. If you can prove otherwize let me know. Mustard gas (S and N types) have military uses (EDIT not that I am saying these can ever be legitimate) , medical uses and uses as an intermediary substances for the manufacture of some common plastics. Refer to the Merck or the Chem Engr's Hand Book or any Advanced Organic Chemistry Text. This is why the inspectors have to be professionally technically qualified and experienced, not just a bunch of intelligence officers or soldiers who have at best year 12 chemistry and are clueless. ICI's site might also have technical information pertanent to this discussion, feel free to go there |
| Offline | Profile | | Quote | ^ |
| doctortobe | May 19 2004, 02:40 AM Post #60 |
|
Speak softly, and carry a 57 megaton stick!
|
Somerland- They gave you the links to where the BBC and ABC have posted reports on THEIR OFFICIAL WEBSITES. Surely the BBC and ABC know what is being put on their news pages? Unless both the BBC and ABC are so incompetant that they could not find any mention of this story AND they somehow put the story onto their own website without knowing it (showing further stupidity), I am suspicious as to why the these nes organizations have deigned not to even LOOK into the issue. On another note, the sarin shell was mentioned in the New York Times.... on page 11. It seems some marriage issue took the front page. Could it be that liberals are so unwilling to give Bush this HUGE victory this close to November that some of them are actually trying to decieve the public? |
| Offline | Profile | | Quote | ^ |
![]() ZetaBoards gives you all the tools to create a successful discussion community. Learn More · Sign-up Now |
|
| Go to Next Page | |
| « Previous Topic · Politics and World Events Forum · Next Topic » |


might have been less unmanly - just a thought.
Thanks for the thought. Are two people really a group though?




9:10 AM Jul 11