| We hope you enjoy your visit. You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
| Kerry and Bush; will vie to be the next US President. | |
|---|---|
| Topic Started: Mar 2 2004, 11:05 PM (438 Views) | |
| 24thcenstfan | Mar 2 2004, 11:05 PM Post #1 |
|
This is good. This is really very good.
|
Well folks, looks like it is going to be Kerry vs. Bush this November. Should be an exciting, fun-filled, mud-slinging 8 months (approx).
:rolleyes:
Kerry Celebrates Claim to Dem Nomination Super Tuesday Sinks Edwards I think the Economy and Jobs are going to be the two key issues for this year's campaign. Iraq, Social Security, Education will all be discussed, but I think the Economy drum will be beaten the loudest.
|
| Offline | Profile | | Quote | ^ |
| Adrian | Mar 2 2004, 11:58 PM Post #2 |
|
Lieutenant Commander
|
24thcentfan hits on an important point: in this election, the agenda that is set will determine the winner. If jobs, the economy,the war in Iraq, and Bush's job performance become the issues Kerry will carry the day (get it?). If the threat of terrorism, gay marriage, or social issues grow to import Bush will win. |
| Offline | Profile | | Quote | ^ |
| ImpulseEngine | Mar 3 2004, 12:30 AM Post #3 |
|
Admiral
|
24, I'm not so sure about the Economy and Jobs part. The Democrats will probably try to set those at the two key issues, but Bush's camp has to know that won't be good for them. So they will try to divert attention back onto the anti-terrorism/making America safer theme. After all, that's about all Bush can even attempt to brag about. Well, at least that's my unbiased view.
|
| Offline | Profile | | Quote | ^ |
| 24thcenstfan | Mar 3 2004, 01:00 AM Post #4 |
|
This is good. This is really very good.
|
^^IE No, not biased at all! You make a good point though. I can see the Bush camp possibly campaigning the hardest on anti-terrorism/homeland security. Early campaign signs in this speech today: President Marks Homeland Security's Accomplishments at Year One
|
| Offline | Profile | | Quote | ^ |
| Swidden | Mar 3 2004, 03:20 AM Post #5 |
|
Adm. Gadfly-at-large; Provisional wRench-fly at large
|
How the economy improves or fails to improve during the months leading up to the General Election in November will be what turns out to be the overriding factor for most voters. It is getting better, but seems a more typical recovery than compared to the recover following the 91/92 dip. In the mid-90's too many people believed the headlines touting the "New Economy", the one supposedly immune to recession. Joe Sixpack got burned in this last down turn that began in March of 2000, and is not jumping back into the stock markets with wild abandon. We will see how happy people are with the economy in a couple of months. Finally, a late congratualtions to Howard Dean. He finally won one(Vermont)!
This might just be the boost his campaign needs
|
| Offline | Profile | | Quote | ^ |
| fireh8er | Mar 3 2004, 03:38 AM Post #6 |
|
I'm Captain Kirk!
|
That's a good one!
|
| Offline | Profile | | Quote | ^ |
| Admiralbill_gomec | Mar 3 2004, 07:46 AM Post #7 |
|
UberAdmiral
|
Yo Adrian: I guess you haven't noticed, but the economy is booming right now. We've average over four percent growth for over a year, and the recession has been over since the end of 2001. (Average economic growth is 2.5% per year) Bush's job performance is a matter of opinion, isn't it? Aside from steel tariffs and the senior drug prescription bill, I think he's done a phenominal job considering the opposition from the left. I guess you also hadn't noticed that WE WON the war in Iraq, Saddam Hussein is gone, and the Iraqi governing council agreed on a constitution over the weekend? While we see pockets of resistance from a FEW, and I mean few, disgruntled Baathist with CURRENT ties to the remnants of al Queda, a LARGE supermajority of Iraqis actually want us there. Lastly, the 2.3 million jobs lost figure is just a lie. Factors never taken into consideration: people starting new jobs, people starting their own businesses, and people choosing new careers. Hell, I've been off the job rolls since 2000 since I own my one sole proprietership. Considering the unemployment rate is five and a half percent (damned near what economists call "full employment"), manufacturing capacity in use is nearing 20 year highs, and we have the most efficient workforce on Earth, things look pretty good. What can John Kerry do? "Roll back" Bush's tax cuts? Roll back capital gains rates to the Clinton era levels? He should be honest and say he'll RAISE TAXES on just about every one, not the so-called "rich." Other than that, he can be against Bush, but in a dishonest way, which has been what his campaign is all about, and the treasonous left wing media has not called him on it. |
| Offline | Profile | | Quote | ^ |
| Hoss | Mar 3 2004, 08:51 AM Post #8 |
|
Fleet Admiral
|
This what Cheney had to say about the economy and deficit in a recent interview, if you are interested in the Bush/Cheney camp's perspective. The rest of the interview, which can be found here, talks of wmds and the presidential campaign. |
| Offline | Profile | | Quote | ^ |
| ds9074 | Mar 3 2004, 11:15 AM Post #9 |
|
Admiral
|
In the newspaper recently they were showing that President Bush is the first President since before WW2 where the US economy has lost jobs over his term. Whatever other economic indicators are doing if people are out of work they are not going to be happy and are likely to want to blame someone. I saw a picture of Kerry and Edwards sharing a joke recently, the jist of the article was that it is not now beyond credibility to think that those two men could dominate US politics for the next 16 years. To Conservatives that must be the nightmare scenario. |
| Offline | Profile | | Quote | ^ |
| ImpulseEngine | Mar 3 2004, 12:00 PM Post #10 |
|
Admiral
|
^^^ According to exit polls, the majority of Democratic voters who voted for Kerry are not only unhappy with Bush, but angry with him. There's no doubt that a lot of that is due to the enormous job losses during his administration. |
| Offline | Profile | | Quote | ^ |
| Swidden | Mar 3 2004, 12:03 PM Post #11 |
|
Adm. Gadfly-at-large; Provisional wRench-fly at large
|
^^^ 16 years? Really? Isn't that the same prediction that was had for Clinton/Gore in 92? The one major in play state that the Democrats are seriously hopeful about seems to be Ohio (Side note to Wichita: Better bake some cookies or stop by a bakery, you might have company coming...
)
|
| Offline | Profile | | Quote | ^ |
| ds9074 | Mar 3 2004, 12:27 PM Post #12 |
|
Admiral
|
That scenario only got derailed by the narrowest of margins in 2000. Plus, from what I have seen of the two, if it were me I would find Edwards a more interesting candidate than Gore could ever be. I'm not saying its going to happen or is likely but that it can be suggested with even a little credibility is a major shift from the Bush 'shoe in' predicted just a couple of months back. |
| Offline | Profile | | Quote | ^ |
| Admiralbill_gomec | Mar 3 2004, 01:58 PM Post #13 |
|
UberAdmiral
|
Good, I hope that this smacks them in the face when they are presented with FACTS. As for the tremendous job losses, where are they? Our unemployment rate is 5.6%. The exact same amount that Clinton claimed was so phenominal when he re-ran in '96. I've stated it before, and I shall state it again... the 2.3 million jobs lost is A LIE. Get over it, Dems. |
| Offline | Profile | | Quote | ^ |
| ImpulseEngine | Mar 3 2004, 04:39 PM Post #14 |
|
Admiral
|
^^^ Try telling those 2.3 million people that they really didn't lose their jobs. I'm sure every one of them will say "yup, I lied - sorry!" [/sarcasm] |
| Offline | Profile | | Quote | ^ |
| Admiralbill_gomec | Mar 3 2004, 04:58 PM Post #15 |
|
UberAdmiral
|
Is it too much of a stretch to believe they got NEW jobs? Only if you are a Democrat? Hell, I'd be one of them. I took a job in February of '01... lasted 4 months. I've been self-employed since. I'd be, by your reckoning, one of those 2.3 million... although I'm gainfully employed. This happens all the time... and has ever since we started tracking employment. Some jobs GO AWAY. It is a part of the evolutionary process of technology. Others ARE CREATED. As I said, IT IS A LIE to say that 2.3 million jobs vanished and nothing else happened. Why is it that libs have so much of a problem with this? This is (once again, for about the fiftieth time) BASIC ECONOMICS. I'm not being sarcastic when I say that the left has a problem with truth, and will DO ANYTHING, including lie, cheat, and steal (elections) to get their man in the White House. I'm tired of this... if you can't BE HONEST (I mean you, John Kerry), then just pi$$ right off. |
| Offline | Profile | | Quote | ^ |
|
|
| Go to Next Page | |
| « Previous Topic · Politics and World Events Forum · Next Topic » |


Should be an exciting, fun-filled, mud-slinging 8 months (approx).
:rolleyes:
This might just be the boost his campaign needs

3:28 PM Feb 5