| We hope you enjoy your visit. You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
| Slightly. Creepy. Cult of personality. | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: Nov 7 2008, 12:47 AM (840 Views) | |
| Dwayne | Nov 7 2008, 12:47 AM Post #1 |
|
Profanity deleted by Hoss
|
A conversation by Charlie Rose with Jon Meacham & Evan Thomas...
Now they tell us. |
| Offline | Profile | ^ |
| Minuet | Nov 7 2008, 08:20 AM Post #2 |
|
Fleet Admiral Assistant wRench, Chief Supper Officer
|
I don't accept this as proof of any cult of personality. It is one person's opinion and my opinion is that it is sour grapes. |
| Offline | Profile | ^ |
| Dr. Noah | Nov 7 2008, 08:28 AM Post #3 |
|
Sistertrek's Asian Correspondant
|
I can understand why Republicans are so angry about Obama's huge following. His campaign was energized, alive. McCain's campaign lacked a certain oomph. I know very few Republicans that were really jazzed about McCain. I think maybe they're a bit jealous. |
| Offline | Profile | ^ |
| Dwayne | Nov 7 2008, 08:31 AM Post #4 |
|
Profanity deleted by Hoss
|
Ah yes... as if Jon Meacham & Evan Thomas are republicans. They are not. They are reporters. I have to wonder, do any of you people ever really know what they're talking about? Apparently not. Edited by Dwayne, Nov 7 2008, 08:32 AM.
|
| Offline | Profile | ^ |
| Dr. Noah | Nov 7 2008, 08:33 AM Post #5 |
|
Sistertrek's Asian Correspondant
|
So by this logic, no reporter can possibly be a Republican. Your gift for fallacy never ceases to amaze me. Dwayne, do you remember when you told us that education makes you stupid? That was classic. I will never forget that as long as I live. Thanks for that.
Edited by Dr. Noah, Nov 7 2008, 08:35 AM.
|
| Offline | Profile | ^ |
| Minuet | Nov 7 2008, 08:34 AM Post #6 |
|
Fleet Admiral Assistant wRench, Chief Supper Officer
|
I didn't make a comment about what thier political affiliation is. Apparently you need to insult others to stroke your own ego. It's really sad that you can't accept that others don't share your extreme opinions. |
| Offline | Profile | ^ |
| Dwayne | Nov 7 2008, 08:41 AM Post #7 |
|
Profanity deleted by Hoss
|
Jon Meacham & Evan Thomas are not republicans. Can you prove they are? No But I can prove they are Newsweek editors... Now what do you have? Nothing. What is telling is that you and minuet are trying to derail this thread into an attack on me, and not the subject at hand. |
| Offline | Profile | ^ |
| Minuet | Nov 7 2008, 08:44 AM Post #8 |
|
Fleet Admiral Assistant wRench, Chief Supper Officer
|
Um, yeah - we are responsible for turning this into a personal attack.
|
| Offline | Profile | ^ |
| Dr. Noah | Nov 7 2008, 08:44 AM Post #9 |
|
Sistertrek's Asian Correspondant
|
OK, so now the logic is if they are Newsweek editors they cannot possibly be Republicans. This is a really interesting thinking structure you have going on. Tell me more. It's not my intention to derail the thread. I'm just trying to understand your logic. I told you my take on the lightly discussed subject of this cult of personality being "creepy". It's a real deep analysis I must say. Edited by Dr. Noah, Nov 7 2008, 08:47 AM.
|
| Offline | Profile | ^ |
| Minuet | Nov 7 2008, 08:45 AM Post #10 |
|
Fleet Admiral Assistant wRench, Chief Supper Officer
|
Don't ask questions - it's a personal attack
|
| Offline | Profile | ^ |
| Dr. Noah | Nov 7 2008, 08:49 AM Post #11 |
|
Sistertrek's Asian Correspondant
|
It is possible that Obama being "elusive" the last few days could be attributed to high security. There was already a foiled attempt on his life during the campaign. |
| Offline | Profile | ^ |
| Dwayne | Nov 7 2008, 08:52 AM Post #12 |
|
Profanity deleted by Hoss
|
Watch the interview and then you'd know you're not using the word 'elusive' in the same context it was being used by Jon Meacham. |
| Offline | Profile | ^ |
| Dr. Noah | Nov 7 2008, 09:08 AM Post #13 |
|
Sistertrek's Asian Correspondant
|
Yeah, I watched it. Right after your quote ends, it is asked why Thomas thinks he is deeply manipulative and this is the response: "I think he's always in control. He controls events. Events don't control him. He's a pretty calm guy, he seems to be able to get people to do pretty much what he wants. I think to answer your question as to why I have this inkling is that when he was in Harvard there was all this political positioning with liberals and conservatives and he was able to get everyone to believe that he is on thier side and people want to help him. It makes them feel good to help him." Nice selective quoting there by the way. So Obama is charismatic. And I guess that makes him manipulative in that he's able to get people of different political persuasions to get together and help him and feel good about it. Sounds to me like the qualities of a good leader, and in fact Thomas says this as well. But there is little other reference to the use of the word "elusive". I don't understand what's elusive about Obama really. The man has written two books about his life. His website is pages and pages and pages about what he sees as the problems and how he wants to fix them. If you want information about Obama it's not really hard to find. Go on down to the library, check out and read his books, or if you can't be bothered to read a book, check his website. Edited by Dr. Noah, Nov 7 2008, 09:13 AM.
|
| Offline | Profile | ^ |
| Dwayne | Nov 7 2008, 09:12 AM Post #14 |
|
Profanity deleted by Hoss
|
It makes him a cypher... |
| Offline | Profile | ^ |
| Dr. Noah | Nov 7 2008, 09:18 AM Post #15 |
|
Sistertrek's Asian Correspondant
|
ci·pher also cy·pher (sî'fər) Pronunciation Key n. The mathematical symbol (0) denoting absence of quantity; zero. An Arabic numeral or figure; a number. One having no influence or value; a nonentity. A cryptographic system in which units of plain text of regular length, usually letters, are arbitrarily transposed or substituted according to a predetermined code. The key to such a system. A message written or transmitted in such a system. A design combining or interweaving letters or initials; a monogram. http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/cypher I'm confused here Dwayne. Which one of these definitions are you referring to? Cult of personality is a reference to overwhelming popularity so it can't be having no influence or value, a nonentity. And I highly doubt you're saying he's the number zero or a system of arbitrarily transposed letters according to some code, or a monogram. It appears that you, sir, are the one who has no idea what he is talking about. I wonder if you are going to own up to this or run away like you did regarding "Kevin's Law". Edited by Dr. Noah, Nov 7 2008, 09:28 AM.
|
| Offline | Profile | ^ |
| Go to Next Page | |
| « Previous Topic · Politics and World Events Forum · Next Topic » |


2:14 PM Jul 11